NVIDIA Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16 vs NVIDIA Riva TNT2 Ultra
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16 and NVIDIA Riva TNT2 Ultra videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Riva TNT2 Ultra
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 150 MHz vs 100 MHz
- Around 50% higher texture fill rate: 300.0 MTexel / s vs 200.0 MTexel / s
- 2x more maximum memory size: 32 MB vs 16 MB
- Around 38% higher memory clock speed: 183 MHz vs 133 MHz
Core clock speed | 150 MHz vs 100 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 300.0 MTexel / s vs 200.0 MTexel / s |
Maximum memory size | 32 MB vs 16 MB |
Memory clock speed | 183 MHz vs 133 MHz |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16 | NVIDIA Riva TNT2 Ultra | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fahrenheit | Fahrenheit |
Code name | NV5 B6 | NV5 B5 |
Launch date | 22 March 1999 | 15 March 1999 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 100 MHz | 150 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 250 nm | 250 nm |
Texture fill rate | 200.0 MTexel / s | 300.0 MTexel / s |
Transistor count | 15 million | 15 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x VGA | 1x VGA, 2x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | AGP 4x | AGP 4x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 6.0 | 6.0 |
OpenGL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 MB | 32 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 1.064 GB / s | 2.928 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 133 MHz | 183 MHz |
Memory type | SDR | SDR |