NVIDIA T600 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 M280X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T600 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 M280X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T600 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 996.4x more texture fill rate: 55.80 GTexel/s vs 56 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 vs 5 February 2015 |
Texture fill rate | 55.80 GTexel/s vs 56 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M280X
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 930 MHz
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 896 vs 640
- Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41708 vs 34747
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 930 MHz |
Pipelines | 896 vs 640 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41708 vs 34747 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T600 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M280X
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA T600 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 M280X |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34747 | 41708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 247 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 814 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA T600 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 M280X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | TU117 | Saturn |
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 | 5 February 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 657 | 659 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1335 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 55.80 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 3.571 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.786 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 640 | 896 |
Pixel fill rate | 44.64 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 55.80 GTexel/s | 56 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 2,080 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,792 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | Not Listed | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 11 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | Not Listed |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 88 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | Not Listed |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |