NVIDIA Tesla K40s vs AMD Radeon R9 270
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K40s and AMD Radeon R9 270 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K40s
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 178.8 GTexel / s vs 74 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 2880 vs 1280
- Around 81% better floating-point performance: 4,291 gflops vs 2,368 gflops
- 6x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 2 GB
Texture fill rate | 178.8 GTexel / s vs 74 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2880 vs 1280 |
Floating-point performance | 4,291 gflops vs 2,368 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 2 GB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270
- Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 245 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 245 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K40s
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K40s | AMD Radeon R9 270 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4306 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 567 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74175 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.721 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1282.039 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.927 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 93.116 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 261.843 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3448 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3448 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1603 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K40s | AMD Radeon R9 270 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK110B | Curacao |
Launch date | 22 November 2013 | 13 November 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $7,699 | $179 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 521 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 4,291 gflops | 2,368 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2880 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 178.8 GTexel / s | 74 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 245 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 2,800 million |
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 1280 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 210 mm |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB / s | 179.2 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |