NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q vs ATI Radeon X600 SE
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q and ATI Radeon X600 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 77% higher core clock speed: 574 MHz vs 325 MHz
- 24.7x more texture fill rate: 32.1 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 110 nm
- 48x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 128 MB
- 6.3x more memory clock speed: 3132 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 229
- 26.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1306 vs 49
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 vs 1 September 2004 |
Core clock speed | 574 MHz vs 325 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 32.1 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 110 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 vs 229 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1306 vs 49 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X600 SE
- 6.3x lower typical power consumption: 36 Watt vs 225 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 36 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X600 SE
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q | ATI Radeon X600 SE |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.784 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 917.512 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.125 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.227 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.533 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 | 229 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1306 | 49 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q | ATI Radeon X600 SE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Rage 9 |
Code name | GF100 | RV370 |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 | 1 September 2004 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $5,489 | |
Place in performance rating | 770 | 767 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 574 MHz | 325 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 448 | |
Texture fill rate | 32.1 GTexel / s | 1.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 36 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 107 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 248 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB / s | 4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | 500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |