NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB and AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1230 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 7.5x more texture fill rate: 441.6 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 5x more pipelines: 5120 vs 1024
- 7.5x better floating-point performance: 14,131 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 163604 vs 70535
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9969 vs 6316
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9969 vs 6316
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 March 2018 vs 13 March 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1230 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 441.6 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 1024 |
| Floating-point performance | 14,131 gflops vs 1,894 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 163604 vs 70535 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9969 vs 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9969 vs 6316 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 1752 MHz
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8390 vs 3521
- 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 27566 vs 3360
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8390 vs 3521
- 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 27566 vs 3360
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz vs 1752 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8390 vs 3521 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 27566 vs 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8390 vs 3521 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 27566 vs 3360 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8260 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 327 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 163604 | 70535 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 592.008 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 46.266 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 271.318 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2169.759 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9969 | 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3521 | 8390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 27566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9969 | 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3521 | 8390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 27566 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Volta | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GV100 | Pitcairn |
| Launch date | 27 March 2018 | 13 March 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 170 | 172 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1230 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 14,131 gflops | 1,894 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 5120 | 1024 |
| Texture fill rate | 441.6 GTexel / s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 21,100 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 897.0 GB / s | 153.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB with others
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 32 GB vs
AMDRadeon HD 7670A
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 32 GB vs
AMDRadeon R9 270 1024SP
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 32 GB vs
AMDRadeon Pro SSG
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 32 GB vs
AMDRadeon RX 580X
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 32 GB vs
NVIDIARTX A1000 Mobile 6GB
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 32 GB vs
NVIDIACMP 40HX
