NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 and AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2
- Around 48% higher core clock speed: 1370 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 11.2x more texture fill rate: 438.4 GTexel / s vs 39.01 GTexel / s
- 10x more pipelines: 5120 vs 512
- 11.2x better floating-point performance: 14,029 gflops vs 1,248 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 2 GB
Core clock speed | 1370 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 438.4 GTexel / s vs 39.01 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 14,029 gflops vs 1,248 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 2 GB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 4x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1758 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1758 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Name | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 | AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1841 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 390 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10245 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.848 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 438.581 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.268 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 46.988 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 139.235 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3241 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3241 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 | AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Volta | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GV100 | Lexa |
Launch date | 21 June 2017 | 12 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 831 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1370 MHz | 925 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 14,029 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 5120 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 438.4 GTexel / s | 39.01 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 21,100 million | 2,200 million |
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 145 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 900.1 GB / s | 56 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1758 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |