NVIDIA XGPU-S vs NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA XGPU-S and NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA XGPU-S
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 233 MHz vs 175 MHz
- Around 33% higher texture fill rate: 1.864 GTexel / s vs 1.4 GTexel / s
Launch date | 15 November 2001 vs 1 October 2001 |
Core clock speed | 233 MHz vs 175 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 1.864 GTexel / s vs 1.4 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA XGPU-S
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti200
Name | NVIDIA XGPU-S | NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 140 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA XGPU-S | NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kelvin | Kelvin |
Code name | NV2A | NV20 A5 |
Launch date | 15 November 2001 | 1 October 2001 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1166 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 233 MHz | 175 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 150 nm | 150 nm |
Texture fill rate | 1.864 GTexel / s | 1.4 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 57 million | 57 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | AGP 4x | AGP 4x |
Length | 183 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 8.1 | 8.0 |
OpenGL | 1.4 | 1.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | 64 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 400 MHz | 400 MHz |
Memory type | DDR | DDR |