Intel Celeron N3450 revue du processeur
Celeron N3450 processeur produit par Intel; release date: 1 September 2016. Au jour du sortie, le processeur coûta $107 . Le processeur est conçu pour les ordinateurs mobile et est basé sur la microarchitecture Apollo Lake.
Le CPU est barré pour prévenir le overclocking. Nombre total des noyaux - 4, threads - 4. Vitesse de fonctionnement de CPU maximale - 2.20 GHz. Température de fonctionnement maximale - 105°C. Technologie de fabrication - 14 nm . Taille de la cache: L2 - 2 MB.
Genres de mémoire soutenu: DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Taille de mémoire maximale: 8 GB.
Genres de prises de courant soutenu: FCBGA1296. Nombre maximale de processeurs dans une configuration - 1. Consommation d’énergie (TDP): 6 Watt.
Le processor a des graphiques intégrés Intel® HD Graphics 500 avec les paramètres suivantes: fréquence maximale - 700 MHz, taille de mémoire vidéo maximale - 8 GB.
Référence
| PassMark Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 T-Rex |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 T-Rex |
|
|
| Nom | Valeur |
|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 768 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1991 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 282 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 934 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen | 507 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan | 872 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex | 1618 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen | 507.000 Fps |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan | 872.000 Fps |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex | 1618.000 Fps |
Graphiques intégrés – Intel HD Graphics 500
Infos techniques |
|
| Vitesse augmenté | 750 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 144.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 12 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 9 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million |
Performance des jeux
1. Valorant (2020)
2. Hearthstone (2020)
3. Counter-Strike: GO (2012)
4. League of Legends (2019)
5. World of Tanks enCore (2018)
6. Assassin's Creed Odyssey (2018)
7. Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)
8. F1 2018 (2018)
9. The Crew 2 (2018)
10. Far Cry 5 (2018)
11. X-Plane 11.11 (2018)
12. Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017)
13. Team Fortress 2 (2017)
14. Dirt 4 (2017)
15. Rocket League (2017)
16. Prey (2017)
2. Hearthstone (2020)
3. Counter-Strike: GO (2012)
4. League of Legends (2019)
5. World of Tanks enCore (2018)
6. Assassin's Creed Odyssey (2018)
7. Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)
8. F1 2018 (2018)
9. The Crew 2 (2018)
10. Far Cry 5 (2018)
11. X-Plane 11.11 (2018)
12. Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017)
13. Team Fortress 2 (2017)
14. Dirt 4 (2017)
15. Rocket League (2017)
16. Prey (2017)
17. For Honor (2017)
18. Overwatch (2016)
19. Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
20. World of Warships (2015)
21. Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
22. Dirt Rally (2015)
23. Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014)
24. Sims 4 (2014)
25. BioShock Infinite (2013)
26. Tomb Raider (2013)
27. Diablo III (2012)
28. The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
29. Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011)
30. StarCraft 2 (2010)
31. Trackmania Nations Forever (2008)
32. World of Warcraft (2005)
18. Overwatch (2016)
19. Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
20. World of Warships (2015)
21. Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
22. Dirt Rally (2015)
23. Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014)
24. Sims 4 (2014)
25. BioShock Infinite (2013)
26. Tomb Raider (2013)
27. Diablo III (2012)
28. The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
29. Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011)
30. StarCraft 2 (2010)
31. Trackmania Nations Forever (2008)
32. World of Warcraft (2005)
Valorant (2020)
| Low, 1280x720 | 9.09 |
Hearthstone (2020)
| Low, 1920x1080 | 23.90 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 24.00 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 11.20 |
Counter-Strike: GO (2012)
| Low, 1024x768 | 15.30 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 14.00 |
League of Legends (2019)
| Low, 1280x720 | 28.20 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 20.20 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 13.90 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 12.60 |
World of Tanks enCore (2018)
| Low, 1366x768 | 34.40 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 4.60 |
Assassin's Creed Odyssey (2018)
| Low, 1280x720 | 2.00 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)
| Low, 1280x720 | 3.00 |
F1 2018 (2018)
| Low, 1280x720 | 12.00 |
The Crew 2 (2018)
| Low, 1280x720 | 5.50 |
Far Cry 5 (2018)
| Low, 1280x720 | 1.00 |
| QHD, 2560x1440 | 1.00 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)
| Low, 1280x720 | 5.50 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 4.32 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 3.96 |
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017)
| Low, 1280x720 | 10.00 |
Team Fortress 2 (2017)
| Low, 1280x720 | 19.70 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 17.20 |
Dirt 4 (2017)
| Low, 1280x720 | 10.00 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 5.60 |
Rocket League (2017)
| Low, 1280x720 | 18.10 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 6.20 |
Prey (2017)
| Low, 1280x720 | 4.90 |
For Honor (2017)
| Low, 1280x720 | 8.70 |
Overwatch (2016)
| Low, 1280x720 | 15.90 |
Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
| Low, 1024x768 | 15.50 |
World of Warships (2015)
| Low, 1366x768 | 19.10 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
| Low, 1280x720 | 22.10 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 15.30 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 5.60 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 5.10 |
Dirt Rally (2015)
| Low, 1024x768 | 28.50 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 12.50 |
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014)
| Low, 1280x720 | 17.70 |
Sims 4 (2014)
| Low, 1024x768 | 71.60 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 13.70 |
BioShock Infinite (2013)
| Low, 1280x720 | 21.00 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 9.83 |
| High, 1366x768 | 8.89 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 2.70 |
Tomb Raider (2013)
| Low, 1024x768 | 21.50 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 9.30 |
Diablo III (2012)
| Low, 1024x768 | 17.35 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 13.60 |
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
| Low, 1280x720 | 11.20 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 7.60 |
Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011)
| Low, 1024x768 | 22.90 |
| High, 1366x768 | 11.10 |
StarCraft 2 (2010)
| Low, 1024x768 | 54.50 |
| Medium, 1360x768 | 14.10 |
Trackmania Nations Forever (2008)
| Low, 640x480 | 119.00 |
| High, 1024x768 | 27.20 |
World of Warcraft (2005)
| Low, 800x600 | 46.00 |
Caractéristiques
Essentiel |
|
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Apollo Lake |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2016 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $107 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2556 |
| Prix maintenant | $165.70 |
| Numéro du processeur | N3450 |
| Série | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series |
| Statut | Launched |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 3.26 |
| Segment vertical | Mobile |
Performance |
|
| Soutien de 64-bit | |
| Fréquence de base | 1.10 GHz |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 105°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.20 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 |
Mémoire |
|
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s |
Graphiques |
|
| Device ID | 0x5A85 |
| Unités d’éxécution | 12 |
| Graphics base frequency | 200 MHz |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 700 MHz |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | |
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | |
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | |
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 8 GB |
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel® HD Graphics 500 |
Interfaces de graphiques |
|
| DisplayPort | |
| eDP | |
| HDMI | |
| MIPI-DSI | |
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 |
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | |
Soutien des graphiques API |
|
| DirectX | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 |
Compatibilité |
|
| Low Halogen Options Available | |
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 |
| Dimensions du boîtier | 24mm x 31mm |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4 W |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCBGA1296 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt |
Périphériques |
|
| LAN integré | |
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 6 |
| Nombre maximale des ports SATA 6 Gb/s | 2 |
| Nombre des ports USB | 8 |
| Révision PCI Express | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4 + 1x2 or 4x1 or 2x1+1x2 + 1x2 |
| Nombre total des ports SATA | 2 |
| UART | |
| Révision USB | 2.0/3.0 |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
|
| Technologie Anti-Theft | |
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | |
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | |
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | |
| Intel® OS Guard | |
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | |
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | |
| Secure Boot | |
Technologies élevé |
|
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | |
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | |
| HD Audio | |
| Idle States | |
| Intel 64 | |
| Intel® AES New Instructions | |
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | |
| Technologie Intel® Rapid Storage (RST) | |
| Technologie Intel® Smart Response | |
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | |
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | |
| Éligibilité à la plateforme Intel® vPro™ | |
| Smart Connect | |
| Thermal Monitoring | |
Virtualization |
|
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | |
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | |
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) | |
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | |
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Celeron N3450 avec des autres
IntelCeleron N3450 vs
IntelCore 2 Solo SU3500
IntelCeleron N3450 vs
IntelCore i5-3317U
IntelCeleron N3450 vs
IntelCore i3-3229Y
IntelCeleron N3450 vs
AMDE2-9000e
IntelCeleron N3450 vs
AMDGX-420CA
IntelCeleron N3450 vs
AMDA4-9120e
