AMD A10-7800 versus AMD PRO A10-8750B
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD A10-7800 et AMD PRO A10-8750B pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A10-7800
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1458 versus 1328
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 3215 versus 2950
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 476 versus 433
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1390 versus 1242
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1458 versus 1328 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3215 versus 2950 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 476 versus 433 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1390 versus 1242 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD PRO A10-8750B
- Environ 3% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 4 GHz versus 3.9 GHz
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 17.07 versus 4.473
- 20.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 221.069 versus 10.821
- 7.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.319 versus 0.18
- 38x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.369 versus 0.668
- 19.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 88.743 versus 4.524
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1790 versus 1508
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6033 versus 3316
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1790 versus 1508
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6033 versus 3316
| Caractéristiques | |
| Fréquence maximale | 4 GHz versus 3.9 GHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 17.07 versus 4.473 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 221.069 versus 10.821 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.319 versus 0.18 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.369 versus 0.668 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 88.743 versus 4.524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1790 versus 1508 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6033 versus 3316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1790 versus 1508 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6033 versus 3316 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD A10-7800
CPU 2: AMD PRO A10-8750B
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD A10-7800 | AMD PRO A10-8750B |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1458 | 1328 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3215 | 2950 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 476 | 433 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1390 | 1242 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.473 | 17.07 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 10.821 | 221.069 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.18 | 1.319 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.668 | 25.369 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.524 | 88.743 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1750 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1508 | 1790 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3316 | 6033 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1750 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1508 | 1790 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3316 | 6033 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD A10-7800 | AMD PRO A10-8750B | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | AMD PRO A-Series Processors |
| OPN PIB | AD7800YBJABOX | |
| OPN Tray | AD7800YBI44JA | AD875BYBI44JC |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2076 | 1005 |
| Série | AMD A10-Series APU for Desktops | AMD PRO A-Series A10 APU for Desktops |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, Windows 7 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 3.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Compute Cores | 12 | 12 |
| Cache L1 | 256 KB | |
| Cache L2 | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 71.30°C | 71.30°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.9 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | 4 |
| Ouvert | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Graphiques |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 720 MHz | 757 MHz |
| Compte de noyaux iGPU | 512 | 512 |
| Graphiques du processeur | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Configurable TDP | 45 Watt/65 Watt | 45 Watt/65 Watt |
| Prise courants soutenu | FM2+ | FM2+ |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Technologies élevé |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| RAID | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer AMD A10-7800 avec des autres
AMDA10-7800 vs
AMDAthlon X2 7450
AMDA10-7800 vs
AMDA6-3620
AMDA10-7800 vs
IntelCore i5-4670S
AMDA10-7800 vs
IntelCore i3-4130
AMDA10-7800 vs
IntelPentium G3258
AMDA10-7800 vs
AMDRyzen 3 1200
