AMD A10-8700P versus AMD A6-5350M
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD A10-8700P et AMD A6-5350M pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A10-8700P
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- 2 plus de noyaux, lancer plus d’applications á la fois: 4 versus 2
- 2 plus de fils: 4 versus 2
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 28 nm versus 32 nm
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 35 Watt
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2245 versus 1221
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1022 versus 587
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.577 versus 1.512
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5.923 versus 3.639
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.129 versus 0.068
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 875 versus 286
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4890 versus 3294
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 875 versus 286
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4890 versus 3294
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 3 June 2015 versus 12 March 2013 |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 versus 2 |
Nombre de fils | 4 versus 2 |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 32 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 35 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2245 versus 1221 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1022 versus 587 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.577 versus 1.512 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5.923 versus 3.639 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.129 versus 0.068 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 875 versus 286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4890 versus 3294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 875 versus 286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4890 versus 3294 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A6-5350M
- Environ 9% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.5 GHz versus 3.2 GHz
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1226 versus 1146
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 381 versus 372
- 20.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 8.322 versus 0.403
- 9.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 30.007 versus 3.048
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1969 versus 1563
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1969 versus 1563
Caractéristiques | |
Fréquence maximale | 3.5 GHz versus 3.2 GHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1226 versus 1146 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 381 versus 372 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.322 versus 0.403 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.007 versus 3.048 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1969 versus 1563 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1969 versus 1563 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD A10-8700P
CPU 2: AMD A6-5350M
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD A10-8700P | AMD A6-5350M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1146 | 1226 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2245 | 1221 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 372 | 381 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1022 | 587 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.577 | 1.512 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5.923 | 3.639 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.129 | 0.068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.403 | 8.322 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.048 | 30.007 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 875 | 286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1563 | 1969 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4890 | 3294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 875 | 286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1563 | 1969 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4890 | 3294 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD A10-8700P | AMD A6-5350M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Nom de code de l’architecture | Carrizo | Richland |
Family | AMD A-Series Processors | AMD A-Series Processors |
Date de sortie | 3 June 2015 | 12 March 2013 |
OPN Tray | AM870PAAY43KA | AM5350DEC23HL |
OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, Windows 7 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2114 | 2134 |
Série | AMD A10-Series APU for AIOs | AMD A6-Series APU for Laptops |
Segment vertical | All-in-One | Laptop |
Performance |
||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Base frequency | 1.8 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
Compute Cores | 10 | |
Cache L2 | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | |
Fréquence maximale | 3.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 2 |
Number of GPU cores | 6 | |
Nombre de fils | 4 | 2 |
Compte de transistor | 3100 Million | 1178 million |
Ouvert | ||
Taille de dé | 246 mm | |
Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 71 °C | |
Mémoire |
||
Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3 | DDR3-1600 |
Graphiques |
||
Enduro | ||
Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 800 MHz | 533 MHz |
Compte de noyaux iGPU | 6 | |
Graphiques du processeur | AMD Radeon R6 Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 8450G |
Graphiques changeables | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
Prise courants soutenu | FP4 | FS1r2 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
Périphériques |
||
Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | Not Listed |
Technologies élevé |
||
AMD App Acceleration | ||
AMD Elite Experiences | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
AMD Mantle API | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
FreeSync | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Out-of-band client management | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
System Image Stability | ||
TrueAudio | ||
VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2.0 |