AMD A10 Pro-7350B versus AMD A6-5350M
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD A10 Pro-7350B et AMD A6-5350M pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A10 Pro-7350B
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- 2 plus de noyaux, lancer plus d’applications á la fois: 4 versus 2
- 2 plus de fils: 4 versus 2
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 28 nm versus 32 nm
- 2x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 84% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 19 Watt versus 35 Watt
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 1915 versus 1221
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 821 versus 587
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.867 versus 1.512
- 31.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 114.182 versus 3.639
- 8.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.549 versus 0.068
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.33 versus 8.322
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 47.923 versus 30.007
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 607 versus 286
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 607 versus 286
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 4 June 2014 versus 12 March 2013 |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 versus 2 |
Nombre de fils | 4 versus 2 |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 32 nm |
Cache L2 | 4 MB versus 2 MB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt versus 35 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1915 versus 1221 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 821 versus 587 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.867 versus 1.512 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 114.182 versus 3.639 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.549 versus 0.068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.33 versus 8.322 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 47.923 versus 30.007 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 607 versus 286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 607 versus 286 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A6-5350M
- Environ 6% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.5 GHz versus 3.3 GHz
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1226 versus 917
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 381 versus 319
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1969 versus 884
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3294 versus 2724
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1969 versus 884
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3294 versus 2724
Caractéristiques | |
Fréquence maximale | 3.5 GHz versus 3.3 GHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1226 versus 917 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 381 versus 319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1969 versus 884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3294 versus 2724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1969 versus 884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3294 versus 2724 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD A10 Pro-7350B
CPU 2: AMD A6-5350M
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD A10 Pro-7350B | AMD A6-5350M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 917 | 1226 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1915 | 1221 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 319 | 381 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 821 | 587 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.867 | 1.512 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 114.182 | 3.639 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.549 | 0.068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.33 | 8.322 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 47.923 | 30.007 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 607 | 286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 884 | 1969 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2724 | 3294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 607 | 286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 884 | 1969 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2724 | 3294 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD A10 Pro-7350B | AMD A6-5350M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Nom de code de l’architecture | Kaveri | Richland |
Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | AMD A-Series Processors |
Date de sortie | 4 June 2014 | 12 March 2013 |
OPN Tray | AM735BECH44JA | AM5350DEC23HL |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2117 | 2134 |
Série | AMD PRO A-Series A10 APU for Laptops | AMD A6-Series APU for Laptops |
Segment vertical | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Base frequency | 2.1 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
Compute Cores | 10 | |
Taille de dé | 245 mm | 246 mm |
Cache L2 | 4 MB | 2 MB |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Fréquence maximale | 3.3 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 2 |
Number of GPU cores | 6 | |
Nombre de fils | 4 | 2 |
Compte de transistor | 2410 Million | 1178 million |
Ouvert | ||
Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 71 °C | |
Mémoire |
||
Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
Supported memory frequency | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3 / DDR3L-1600 | DDR3-1600 |
Graphiques |
||
Enduro | ||
Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 553 MHz | 533 MHz |
Compte de noyaux iGPU | 384 | |
Nombre de pipelines | 384 | |
Graphiques du processeur | AMD Radeon R6 Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 8450G |
Graphiques changeables | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
Prise courants soutenu | FP3 | FS1r2 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 35 Watt |
Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
Périphériques |
||
Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | Not Listed |
Technologies élevé |
||
AMD App Acceleration | ||
AMD Elite Experiences | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
AMD Mantle API | ||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Out-of-band client management | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
RAID | ||
System Image Stability | ||
TrueAudio | ||
VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2.0 |