AMD PRO A10-8770E versus AMD PRO A8-9600
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD PRO A10-8770E et AMD PRO A8-9600 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Interfaces de graphiques. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD PRO A10-8770E
- Environ 3% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.5 GHz versus 3.4 GHz
- Environ 86% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 65 Watt
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 292.262 versus 269.509
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4797 versus 4551
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4797 versus 4551
| Caractéristiques | |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.5 GHz versus 3.4 GHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 65 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 292.262 versus 269.509 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4797 versus 4551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4797 versus 4551 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD PRO A8-9600
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1509 versus 1448
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 3333 versus 3018
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 17.191 versus 15.458
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.523 versus 1.344
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.695 versus 24.533
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 84.399 versus 75.093
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1299 versus 1292
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1377 versus 1298
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1299 versus 1292
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1377 versus 1298
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1509 versus 1448 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3333 versus 3018 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 17.191 versus 15.458 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.523 versus 1.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.695 versus 24.533 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.399 versus 75.093 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1299 versus 1292 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1377 versus 1298 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1299 versus 1292 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1377 versus 1298 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD PRO A10-8770E
CPU 2: AMD PRO A8-9600
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD PRO A10-8770E | AMD PRO A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1448 | 1509 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3018 | 3333 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 2131 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 4938 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.458 | 17.191 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 292.262 | 269.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.344 | 1.523 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.533 | 27.695 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 75.093 | 84.399 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1292 | 1299 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1298 | 1377 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4797 | 4551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1292 | 1299 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1298 | 1377 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4797 | 4551 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD PRO A10-8770E | AMD PRO A8-9600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | AMD PRO A-Series Processors |
| Date de sortie | Q3 2016 | 3 October 2016 |
| OPN Tray | AD877BAHM44AB | AD960BAGM44AB |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, Windows 7 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1053 | 999 |
| Série | AMD PRO A-Series A10 APU for Desktops | AMD PRO A-Series A8 APU for Desktops |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 2.8 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.5 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 6 | 6 |
| Ouvert | ||
| Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | 2400 MHz |
Graphiques |
||
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 847 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Graphiques du processeur | R7 | R7 |
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| Enduro | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Prise courants soutenu | AM4 | AM4 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Configurable TDP | 45 Watt/65 Watt | |
Périphériques |
||
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Technologies élevé |
||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| AMD Secure technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer AMD PRO A10-8770E avec des autres
AMDPRO A10-8770E vs
IntelCore i5-2500T
AMDPRO A10-8770E vs
AMDPRO A12-9800
AMDPRO A10-8770E vs
AMDA10-7860K
AMDPRO A10-8770E vs
IntelCore i3-7101E
AMDPRO A10-8770E vs
AMDRyzen 5 3400GE
AMDPRO A10-8770E vs
IntelCore i5-10400F
