AMD RX-421BD versus Intel Core i7-5700HQ
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD RX-421BD et Intel Core i7-5700HQ pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Qualité des images graphiques, Sécurité & fiabilité. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD RX-421BD
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 97043% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3400 MHz versus 3.50 GHz
- Environ 25% plus de la cache L1, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L1 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- 2x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 34% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 47 Watt
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1942 versus 1314
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7025 versus 2395
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1942 versus 1314
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7025 versus 2395
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 21 October 2015 versus 2 June 2015 |
| Fréquence maximale | 3400 MHz versus 3.50 GHz |
| Cache L1 | 320 KB versus 256 KB |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB versus 1 MB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 47 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1942 versus 1314 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7025 versus 2395 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1942 versus 1314 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7025 versus 2395 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i7-5700HQ
- 4 plus de fils: 8 versus 4
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.427 versus 3.817
- 10.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 114.854 versus 10.518
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.677 versus 0.189
- 8.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 5.327 versus 0.608
- 9.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 44.62 versus 4.623
- 181.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1455 versus 8
- 181.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1455 versus 8
| Caractéristiques | |
| Nombre de fils | 8 versus 4 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.427 versus 3.817 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 114.854 versus 10.518 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.677 versus 0.189 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.327 versus 0.608 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.62 versus 4.623 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1455 versus 8 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1455 versus 8 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD RX-421BD
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-5700HQ
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD RX-421BD | Intel Core i7-5700HQ |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.817 | 15.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 10.518 | 114.854 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.189 | 0.677 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.608 | 5.327 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.623 | 44.62 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8 | 1455 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1942 | 1314 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7025 | 2395 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8 | 1455 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1942 | 1314 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7025 | 2395 |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2019 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 6041 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 831 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2873 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD RX-421BD | Intel Core i7-5700HQ | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Merlin Falcon | Broadwell |
| Family | AMD R-Series | |
| Date de sortie | 21 October 2015 | 2 June 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1721 | 1648 |
| Processor Number | RX-421BD | i7-5700HQ |
| Segment vertical | Embedded | Mobile |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $378 | |
| Série | 5th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors | |
| Status | Launched | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2100 MHz | 2.70 GHz |
| Taille de dé | 1073 mm2 | |
| Cache L1 | 320 KB | 256 KB |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB | 1 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Fréquence maximale | 3400 MHz | 3.50 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | 8 |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
| Cache L3 | 6 MB | |
| Température de noyau maximale | 105°C | |
Mémoire |
||
| Soutien de la mémoire ECC | ||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 38.4 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3-2133, DDR4-2400 | DDR3L 1600/1866 LPDDR3 1600/1866 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB | |
Graphiques |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 800 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Nombre de pipelines | 512 | |
| Graphiques du processeur | Radeon R7 series | Intel HD Graphics 5600 |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Device ID | 0x1612 | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.05 GHz | |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 1.05 GHz | |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 32 GB | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | 3 |
| VGA | ||
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2/12 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Compatibilité |
||
| Configurable TDP | 12-35 Watt | |
| Package Size | micro-BGA | 37.5mm x 32mm x 1.8mm |
| Prise courants soutenu | BGA (FP4) | FCBGA1364 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 47 Watt |
| Configurable TDP-down | 37 W | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 600 MHz | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Périphériques |
||
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| UART | ||
| Révision USB | 3.0 | |
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 16 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1x16 or 2x8 or 1x8 2x4 | |
Technologies élevé |
||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® Smart Response | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 2560x1600@60Hz | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer AMD RX-421BD avec des autres
AMDRX-421BD vs
IntelCore i3-4100M
AMDRX-421BD vs
IntelCeleron 3215U
AMDRX-421BD vs
IntelCeleron G3900E
AMDRX-421BD vs
AMDRX-425BB
AMDRX-421BD vs
AMDRyzen Embedded V1500B
AMDRX-421BD vs
AppleA11 Bionic
