Intel Atom x7-Z8700 versus Intel Atom x5-Z8350
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Atom x7-Z8700 et Intel Atom x5-Z8350 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Atom x7-Z8700
- Environ 25% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 2.40 GHz versus 1.92 GHz
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 651 versus 472
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 1331 versus 893
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 220 versus 168
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 753 versus 529
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.722 versus 2.011
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.665 versus 1.185
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 627 versus 380
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1754 versus 1160
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 627 versus 380
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1754 versus 1160
Caractéristiques | |
Fréquence maximale | 2.40 GHz versus 1.92 GHz |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 651 versus 472 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1331 versus 893 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 220 versus 168 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 753 versus 529 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.722 versus 2.011 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.665 versus 1.185 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 627 versus 380 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1754 versus 1160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 627 versus 380 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1754 versus 1160 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Atom x5-Z8350
- 6.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 55.944 versus 8.996
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.334 versus 0.139
- 6.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 3.487 versus 0.519
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1180 versus 974
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1180 versus 974
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 55.944 versus 8.996 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.334 versus 0.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.487 versus 0.519 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1180 versus 974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1180 versus 974 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Atom x7-Z8700
CPU 2: Intel Atom x5-Z8350
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel Atom x7-Z8700 | Intel Atom x5-Z8350 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 651 | 472 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1331 | 893 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 220 | 168 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 753 | 529 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.722 | 2.011 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 8.996 | 55.944 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.139 | 0.334 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.519 | 3.487 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.665 | 1.185 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 627 | 380 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 974 | 1180 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1754 | 1160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 627 | 380 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 974 | 1180 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1754 | 1160 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel Atom x7-Z8700 | Intel Atom x5-Z8350 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Nom de code de l’architecture | Cherry Trail | Cherry Trail |
Date de sortie | Q1'15 | Q1'16 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2809 | 2801 |
Processor Number | x7-Z8700 | x5-Z8350 |
Série | Intel® Atom™ Processor X Series | Intel® Atom™ Processor X Series |
Status | Launched | Launched |
Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Base frequency | 1.60 GHz | 1.44 GHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | 90°C |
Fréquence maximale | 2.40 GHz | 1.92 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
Nombre de fils | 4 | 4 |
Mémoire |
||
Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 1 |
Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 25.6 GB/s | 12.8 GB/s |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Genres de mémoire soutenus | LPDDR3 1600 | DDR3L-RS 1600 |
Graphiques |
||
Unités d’éxécution | 16 | 12 |
Graphics base frequency | 200 MHz | 200 MHz |
Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 600 MHz | 500 MHz |
Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 500 MHz | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | 2 |
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
Résolution maximale sur eDP | 2560x1600 | |
Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Compatibilité |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 17mm x 17mm | 17mm x 17mm |
Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 2 W | 2 W |
Prise courants soutenu | UTFCBGA1380 | UTFCBGA592 |
Périphériques |
||
Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 2 | 1 |
Nombre des ports USB | 3 | |
Révision PCI Express | 2.0 | 2.0 |
PCIe configurations | 2x1, 1x2 | 1x1 |
Révision USB | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
Secure Boot | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |