Intel Atom x7-Z8700 versus Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Atom x7-Z8700 et Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Soutien des graphiques API. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Atom x7-Z8700
- 2 plus de noyaux, lancer plus d’applications á la fois: 4 versus 2
- Environ 50% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 2.40 GHz versus 1.6 GHz
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 versus 2 |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.40 GHz versus 1.6 GHz |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
- Environ 11% température maximale du noyau plus haut: 100°C versus 90°C
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 855 versus 651
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 1576 versus 1333
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 368 versus 220
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 886 versus 753
- 6.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.267 versus 2.722
- 22.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 201.508 versus 8.996
- 9.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.262 versus 0.139
- 23.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.298 versus 0.519
- 13.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.529 versus 1.665
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1341 versus 627
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2395 versus 974
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 versus 1754
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1341 versus 627
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2395 versus 974
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 versus 1754
| Caractéristiques | |
| Température de noyau maximale | 100°C versus 90°C |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 855 versus 651 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1576 versus 1333 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 368 versus 220 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 886 versus 753 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.267 versus 2.722 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 201.508 versus 8.996 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.262 versus 0.139 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.298 versus 0.519 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.529 versus 1.665 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1341 versus 627 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2395 versus 974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 versus 1754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1341 versus 627 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2395 versus 974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 versus 1754 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Atom x7-Z8700
CPU 2: Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Atom x7-Z8700 | Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 651 | 855 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1333 | 1576 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 220 | 368 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 753 | 886 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.722 | 18.267 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 8.996 | 201.508 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.139 | 1.262 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.519 | 12.298 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.665 | 22.529 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 627 | 1341 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 974 | 2395 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1754 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 627 | 1341 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 974 | 2395 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1754 | 3354 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Atom x7-Z8700 | Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Cherry Trail | Kaby Lake |
| Date de sortie | Q1'15 | 21 April 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2819 | 1481 |
| Processor Number | x7-Z8700 | 4415Y |
| Série | Intel® Atom™ Processor X Series | Intel® Pentium® Processor 4000 Series |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $161 | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 1.60 GHz | 1.60 GHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | 100°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.40 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | 4 |
| Bus Speed | 4 GT/s QPI | |
| Cache L1 | 128 KB | |
| Cache L2 | 512 KB | |
| Cache L3 | 2 MB | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 25.6 GB/s | 29.8 GB/s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | LPDDR3 1600 | LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 |
Graphiques |
||
| Unités d’éxécution | 16 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 200 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 600 MHz | |
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Device ID | 0x591E | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 850 MHz | |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel® HD Graphics 615 | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | 3 |
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Résolution maximale sur eDP | 2560x1600 | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 3840x2160 | 4096x2304@24Hz |
| Soutien de la resolution 4K | ||
| Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 17mm x 17mm | 20mm X 16.5mm |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 2 W | |
| Prise courants soutenu | UTFCBGA1380 | FCBGA1515 |
| Configurable TDP-down | 4.5 W | |
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt | |
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 2 | 10 |
| Nombre des ports USB | 3 | |
| Révision PCI Express | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 2x1, 1x2 | 1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1 |
| Révision USB | 3.0 | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1 | |
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® My WiFi | ||
| Technologie Intel® Smart Response | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Atom x7-Z8700 avec des autres
IntelAtom x7-Z8700 vs
IntelCore i7-820QM
IntelAtom x7-Z8700 vs
IntelPentium P6200
IntelAtom x7-Z8700 vs
IntelAtom Z3735G
IntelAtom x7-Z8700 vs
AMDGX-217GA
