Intel Celeron G1820 versus Intel Core i3-3225
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Celeron G1820 et Intel Core i3-3225 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Celeron G1820
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 10% température maximale du noyau plus haut: 72°C versus 65.3°C
- Environ 4% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 53 Watt versus 55 Watt
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.452 versus 2.199
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 28.651 versus 19.299
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2399 versus 2337
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2399 versus 2337
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | December 2013 versus September 2012 |
| Température de noyau maximale | 72°C versus 65.3°C |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt versus 55 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.452 versus 2.199 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 28.651 versus 19.299 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2399 versus 2337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2399 versus 2337 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i3-3225
- 2 plus de fils: 4 versus 2
- Environ 22% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.3 GHz versus 2.7 GHz
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1700 versus 1539
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2239 versus 1715
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 618 versus 565
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1394 versus 1036
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.27 versus 0.235
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.054 versus 0.945
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.765 versus 2.149
| Caractéristiques | |
| Nombre de fils | 4 versus 2 |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.3 GHz versus 2.7 GHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1700 versus 1539 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2239 versus 1715 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 618 versus 565 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1394 versus 1036 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.27 versus 0.235 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.054 versus 0.945 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.765 versus 2.149 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Celeron G1820
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-3225
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Celeron G1820 | Intel Core i3-3225 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1539 | 1700 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1715 | 2239 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 565 | 618 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1036 | 1394 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.452 | 2.199 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 28.651 | 19.299 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.235 | 0.27 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.945 | 1.054 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.149 | 2.765 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 612 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1320 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2399 | 2337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 612 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1320 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2399 | 2337 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Celeron G1820 | Intel Core i3-3225 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Haswell | Ivy Bridge |
| Date de sortie | December 2013 | September 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $110 | $264 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2431 | 2443 |
| Prix maintenant | $75 | $99.99 |
| Processor Number | G1820 | i3-3225 |
| Série | Intel® Celeron® Processor G Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.83 | 12.77 |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2.70 GHz | 3.30 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | 5 GT/s DMI |
| Taille de dé | 177 mm | 118 mm |
| Cache L1 | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 3072 KB (shared) | 3072 KB (shared) |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 72 °C | 65 °C |
| Température de noyau maximale | 72°C | 65.3°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.7 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 2 | 4 |
| Compte de transistor | 1400 million | |
Mémoire |
||
| Soutien de la mémoire ECC | ||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 21.3 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3-1333, DDR3L-1333 @ 1.5V | DDR3 1333/1600 |
Graphiques |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.05 GHz | 1.05 GHz |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 1.05 GHz | 1.05 GHz |
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 1.7 GB | |
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 |
| Device ID | 0x152 | |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | 3 |
| VGA | ||
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 2560x1600@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur eDP | 2560x1600@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 1920x1080@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | |
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 11.1/12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCLGA1150 | FCLGA1155 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2013C | 2011C |
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 16 | |
| Révision PCI Express | Up to 3.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 & 2x4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
| Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Technologie Intel® My WiFi | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Celeron G1820 avec des autres
IntelCeleron G1820 vs
IntelPentium E6800
IntelCeleron G1820 vs
AMDA6-3650
IntelCeleron G1820 vs
IntelCore i5-3330S
IntelCeleron G1820 vs
IntelCore i3-3225
IntelCeleron G1820 vs
AMDA8-5500B
IntelCeleron G1820 vs
AMDAthlon X4 760K
