Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 versus Intel Core 2 Duo T9500
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 et Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Compatibilité, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core 2 Duo T9500
- Environ 8% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 2.6 GHz versus 2.4 GHz
- 2x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1071 versus 970
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 1045 versus 902
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 357 versus 321
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 650 versus 535
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.273 versus 0.259
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 21.747 versus 15.787
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.082 versus 0.075
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.586 versus 0.479
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.055 versus 1.875
| Caractéristiques | |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.6 GHz versus 2.4 GHz |
| Cache L2 | 6144 KB versus 3072 KB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1071 versus 970 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1045 versus 902 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 357 versus 321 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 650 versus 535 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.273 versus 0.259 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 21.747 versus 15.787 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.082 versus 0.075 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.586 versus 0.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.055 versus 1.875 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T9500
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 970 | 1071 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 902 | 1045 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 321 | 357 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 535 | 650 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.259 | 0.273 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.787 | 21.747 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.075 | 0.082 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.479 | 0.586 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.875 | 2.055 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Penryn | Penryn |
| Date de sortie | 10 January 2008 | 10 January 2008 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $241 | $530 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 3206 | 3140 |
| Prix maintenant | $213.99 | |
| Processor Number | T8300 | T9500 |
| Série | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 2.03 | |
| Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2.40 GHz | 2.60 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | 800 MHz FSB |
| Taille de dé | 107 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Cache L2 | 3072 KB | 6144 KB |
| Processus de fabrication | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 105°C | 105°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.4 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 2 | 2 |
| Compte de transistor | 410 million | 410 million |
| Rangée de tension VID | 1.000V-1.250V | 1.000V-1.250V |
| Cache L1 | 128 KB | |
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | 35mm x 35mm |
| Prise courants soutenu | PGA478, BGA479 | BGA479, PPGA478, PGA478 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 avec des autres
IntelCore 2 Duo T8300 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo P8600
IntelCore 2 Duo T8300 vs
IntelCore i3-2367M
IntelCore 2 Duo T8300 vs
IntelCore i3-2377M
