Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 versus Intel Core 2 Duo T9300
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 et Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Compatibilité, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core 2 Duo T9400
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 1% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 2.53 GHz versus 2.5 GHz
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1047 versus 1025
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 1011 versus 984
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 618 versus 601
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.272 versus 0.27
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 21.389 versus 20.086
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.993 versus 1.963
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 15 July 2008 versus 10 January 2008 |
Fréquence maximale | 2.53 GHz versus 2.5 GHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1047 versus 1025 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1011 versus 984 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 618 versus 601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.272 versus 0.27 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 21.389 versus 20.086 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.993 versus 1.963 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core 2 Duo T9300
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 352 versus 342
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.559 versus 0.509
Caractéristiques | |
Cache L2 | 6144 KB versus 6134 KB |
Référence | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 352 versus 342 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.559 versus 0.509 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo T9400
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T9300
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Nom | Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1047 | 1025 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1011 | 984 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 342 | 352 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 618 | 601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.272 | 0.27 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 21.389 | 20.086 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.079 | 0.079 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.509 | 0.559 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.993 | 1.963 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Nom de code de l’architecture | Penryn | Penryn |
Date de sortie | 15 July 2008 | 10 January 2008 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $316 | $316 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 3156 | 3159 |
Prix maintenant | $69.95 | $57.99 |
Processor Number | T9400 | T9300 |
Série | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 7.31 | 8.48 |
Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Base frequency | 2.53 GHz | 2.50 GHz |
Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 800 MHz FSB |
Taille de dé | 107 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | 800 MHz |
Cache L1 | 128 KB | 128 KB |
Cache L2 | 6134 KB | 6144 KB |
Processus de fabrication | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Température de noyau maximale | 105°C | 105°C |
Fréquence maximale | 2.53 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
Nombre de fils | 2 | 2 |
Compte de transistor | 410 million | 410 million |
Rangée de tension VID | 1.050V-1.162V | 1.000V-1.250V |
Compatibilité |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | 35mm x 35mm |
Prise courants soutenu | PGA478, BGA479 | PGA478, BGA479 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |