Intel Core i5-4278U versus Intel Celeron 2957U
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core i5-4278U et Intel Celeron 2957U pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i5-4278U
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- 2 plus de fils: 4 versus 2
- Environ 121% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.10 GHz versus 1.4 GHz
- Environ 50% plus de la cache L3, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L3 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1709 versus 772
- 3.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2825 versus 849
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1145 versus 524
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2044 versus 1874
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3331 versus 3071
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1145 versus 524
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2044 versus 1874
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3331 versus 3071
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 21 July 2014 versus 1 January 2014 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 versus 2 |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.10 GHz versus 1.4 GHz |
| Cache L3 | 3 MB versus 2 MB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1709 versus 772 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2825 versus 849 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1145 versus 524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2044 versus 1874 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 versus 3071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1145 versus 524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2044 versus 1874 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 versus 3071 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Celeron 2957U
- Environ 87% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 28 Watt
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.97 versus 2.179
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 107.823 versus 35.732
- 4.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 4.97 versus 1.045
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 5.777 versus 2.564
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 28 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.97 versus 2.179 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 107.823 versus 35.732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.97 versus 1.045 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.777 versus 2.564 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-4278U
CPU 2: Intel Celeron 2957U
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Core i5-4278U | Intel Celeron 2957U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1709 | 772 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2825 | 849 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 687 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1505 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.179 | 6.97 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 35.732 | 107.823 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.258 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.045 | 4.97 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.564 | 5.777 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1145 | 524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2044 | 1874 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 3071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1145 | 524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2044 | 1874 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 3071 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Core i5-4278U | Intel Celeron 2957U | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Haswell | Haswell |
| Date de sortie | 21 July 2014 | 1 January 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $315 | $107 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1967 | 1968 |
| Processor Number | i5-4278U | 2957U |
| Série | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors | Intel® Celeron® Processor 2000 Series |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2.60 GHz | 1.40 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | 5 GT/s DMI2 |
| Taille de dé | 181 mm | |
| Cache L1 | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| Cache L2 | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| Cache L3 | 3 MB | 2 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 100 °C | 100°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.10 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | 2 |
| Compte de transistor | 1300 Million | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3L-1333, 1600; LPDDR3-1333, 1600 | DDR3L 1333/1600, LPDDR3 1333/1600 |
Graphiques |
||
| Device ID | 0xA2E | |
| Graphics base frequency | 200 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.10 GHz | 1.00 GHz |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 1.1 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 2 GB | |
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel® Iris® Graphics 5100 | Intel HD Graphics |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | 3 |
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 3200x2000@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 3280x2000@60Hz | |
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 11.2/12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 40mm x 24mm x 1.5mm | 40mm x 24mm x 1.5mm |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCBGA1168 | FCBGA1168 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt | 15 Watt |
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 12 | 10 |
| Révision PCI Express | 2 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 4x1, 2x4 | 4x1, 1x4, 1x2 |
| IDE integré | ||
| LAN integré | ||
| Nombre maximale des ports SATA 6 Gb/s | 2 | |
| Nombre des ports USB | 4 | |
| Soutien de PCI | ||
| Nombre total des ports SATA | 2 | |
| UART | ||
| Révision USB | 3.0 | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
| Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| HD Audio | ||
| Technologie Intel® Active Management (AMT) | ||
| Intel® ME Firmware Version | 9.5 | |
| Technologie Intel® Rapid Storage (RST) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Smart Response | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Matrix Storage | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Core i5-4278U avec des autres
IntelCore i5-4278U vs
IntelCore 2 Duo P7570
IntelCore i5-4278U vs
IntelCeleron 2957U
IntelCore i5-4278U vs
IntelCeleron 3765U
IntelCore i5-4278U vs
AMDGX-424CC
IntelCore i5-4278U vs
AMDRX-225FB
IntelCore i5-4278U vs
AMDR-272F
