Intel Core i5-4590 versus Intel Core i5-3470
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core i5-4590 et Intel Core i5-3470 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i5-4590
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 2 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 3% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.70 GHz versus 3.60 GHz
- Environ 8% température maximale du noyau plus haut: 72.72°C versus 67.4°C
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 2084 versus 1937
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 5377 versus 4671
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 876 versus 734
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2820 versus 2396
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.798 versus 3.217
- 7.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 71.742 versus 9.637
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.404 versus 0.393
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 2.137 versus 1.821
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 6.131 versus 5.424
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3383 versus 1515
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3383 versus 1515
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | May 2014 versus 8 April 2012 |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.70 GHz versus 3.60 GHz |
| Température de noyau maximale | 72.72°C versus 67.4°C |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2084 versus 1937 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5377 versus 4671 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 876 versus 734 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2820 versus 2396 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.798 versus 3.217 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 71.742 versus 9.637 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.404 versus 0.393 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.137 versus 1.821 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.131 versus 5.424 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3383 versus 1515 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3383 versus 1515 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i5-3470
- Environ 9% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 77 Watt versus 84 Watt
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score: 2696 versus 1893
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 77 Watt versus 84 Watt |
| Référence | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2696 versus 1893 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-4590
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-3470
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Core i5-4590 | Intel Core i5-3470 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2084 | 1937 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5377 | 4671 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 876 | 734 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2820 | 2396 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 1893 | 2696 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.798 | 3.217 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 71.742 | 9.637 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.404 | 0.393 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.137 | 1.821 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.131 | 5.424 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1067 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2023 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3383 | 1515 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1067 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2023 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3383 | 1515 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Core i5-4590 | Intel Core i5-3470 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Haswell | Ivy Bridge |
| Date de sortie | May 2014 | 8 April 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $300 | $184 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1821 | 2409 |
| Prix maintenant | $188.99 | $112.06 |
| Processor Number | i5-4590 | i5-3470 |
| Série | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 11.38 | 17.60 |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 3.30 GHz | 3.20 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | 5 GT/s DMI |
| Taille de dé | 177 mm | 132.8 mm |
| Cache L1 | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 256 KB (per core) | 1024 KB |
| Cache L3 | 6144 KB (shared) | 6144 KB |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 72 °C | 67 °C |
| Température de noyau maximale | 72.72°C | 67.4°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.70 GHz | 3.60 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | 4 |
| Compte de transistor | 1400 million | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V | DDR3 1333/1600 |
Graphiques |
||
| Device ID | 0x412 | 0x152 |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.15 GHz | 1.10 GHz |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 1.15 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 2 GB | |
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | 3 |
| VGA | ||
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur eDP | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | |
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 11.2/12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCLGA1150 | FCLGA1155 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 84 Watt | 77 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2013D | 2011D |
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 16 | |
| Révision PCI Express | Up to 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 & 2x4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® My WiFi | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Core i5-4590 avec des autres
IntelCore i5-4590 vs
AMDPhenom II X6 1065T
IntelCore i5-4590 vs
IntelCore i3-2102
IntelCore i5-4590 vs
IntelCore i5-4430S
IntelCore i5-4590 vs
AMDPhenom X4 B99
IntelCore i5-4590 vs
AMDA4 PRO-7350B
IntelCore i5-4590 vs
IntelPentium Silver J5040
