Intel Core i7-8850H versus Intel Xeon E-2176M
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core i7-8850H et Intel Xeon E-2176M pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Xeon E-2176M
- Environ 2% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 4.40 GHz versus 4.30 GHz
- Environ 33% plus de la cache L3, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L3 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 2459 versus 2375
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 10922 versus 10178
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1088 versus 1025
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 4785 versus 4588
- 5.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.998 versus 6.078
- 8.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 418.903 versus 48.986
- 6.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.172 versus 0.358
- 10.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.52 versus 2.206
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 30.63 versus 10.144
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2120 versus 2025
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1292 versus 1223
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2222 versus 2132
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2120 versus 2025
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1292 versus 1223
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2222 versus 2132
| Caractéristiques | |
| Fréquence maximale | 4.40 GHz versus 4.30 GHz |
| Cache L3 | 12 MB versus 9 MB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2459 versus 2375 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 10922 versus 10178 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1088 versus 1025 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 4785 versus 4588 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.998 versus 6.078 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 418.903 versus 48.986 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.172 versus 0.358 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.52 versus 2.206 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.63 versus 10.144 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2120 versus 2025 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1292 versus 1223 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2222 versus 2132 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2120 versus 2025 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1292 versus 1223 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2222 versus 2132 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core i7-8850H
CPU 2: Intel Xeon E-2176M
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Core i7-8850H | Intel Xeon E-2176M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2375 | 2459 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 10178 | 10922 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1025 | 1088 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 4588 | 4785 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.078 | 30.998 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 48.986 | 418.903 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.358 | 2.172 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.206 | 23.52 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.144 | 30.63 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2025 | 2120 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1223 | 1292 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2132 | 2222 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2025 | 2120 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1223 | 1292 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2132 | 2222 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Core i7-8850H | Intel Xeon E-2176M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Coffee Lake | Coffee Lake |
| Date de sortie | 1 March 2018 | 1 March 2018 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1894 | 1013 |
| Prix maintenant | $395 | $450 |
| Processor Number | i7-8850H | E-2176M |
| Série | 8th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors | Intel® Xeon® E Processor |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 9.97 | 9.17 |
| Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2.60 GHz | 2.70 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI | 8 GT/s DMI |
| Taille de dé | 149 mm | |
| Cache L1 | 384 KB | 384 KB |
| Cache L2 | 1.5 MB | 1.5 MB |
| Cache L3 | 9 MB | 12 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 72 °C | |
| Température de noyau maximale | 100°C | 100°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 4.30 GHz | 4.40 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 6 | 6 |
| Nombre de fils | 12 | 12 |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 41.8 GB/s | 41.8 GB/s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 |
Graphiques |
||
| Device ID | 0x3E9B | 0x3E9B |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.15 GHz | 1.20 GHz |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel® UHD Graphics 630 | Intel® UHD Graphics P630 |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | 3 |
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Soutien de la resolution 4K | ||
| Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Résolution maximale sur eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@30Hz | 4096x2304@30Hz |
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Compatibilité |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 35 W | 35 W |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 42mm x 28mm | 42mm x 28mm |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCBGA1440 | FCBGA1440 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 45 Watt |
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 16 | 16 |
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® My WiFi | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Core i7-8850H avec des autres
IntelCore i7-8850H vs
IntelCore i7-4700MQ
IntelCore i7-8850H vs
IntelCore i5-5200U
IntelCore i7-8850H vs
IntelCore i5-5257U
IntelCore i7-8850H vs
AMDRX-225FB
IntelCore i7-8850H vs
AMDR-272F
IntelCore i7-8850H vs
AMDRyzen Embedded V1500B
