Intel Core i7-960 versus Intel Core i7-920
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core i7-960 et Intel Core i7-920 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Compatibilité, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i7-960
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 18% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.46 GHz versus 2.93 GHz
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1459 versus 1215
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 3351 versus 2840
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 565 versus 469
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2198 versus 1855
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.115 versus 0.873
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 59.327 versus 50.388
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.374 versus 0.3
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.942 versus 4
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | October 2009 versus November 2008 |
Fréquence maximale | 3.46 GHz versus 2.93 GHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1459 versus 1215 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3351 versus 2840 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 565 versus 469 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2198 versus 1855 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.115 versus 0.873 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 59.327 versus 50.388 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.374 versus 0.3 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.942 versus 4 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i7-920
- 4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.595 versus 0.395
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.595 versus 0.395 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core i7-960
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-920
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Nom | Intel Core i7-960 | Intel Core i7-920 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1459 | 1215 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3351 | 2840 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 565 | 469 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2198 | 1855 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | 2227 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.115 | 0.873 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 59.327 | 50.388 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.374 | 0.3 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.395 | 1.595 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.942 | 4 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel Core i7-960 | Intel Core i7-920 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Nom de code de l’architecture | Bloomfield | Bloomfield |
Date de sortie | October 2009 | November 2008 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $316 | $340 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2765 | 2767 |
Prix maintenant | $99.99 | $174 |
Processor Number | i7-960 | i7-920 |
Série | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.14 | 8.34 |
Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Base frequency | 3.20 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
Bus Speed | 4.8 GT/s QPI | 4.8 GT/s QPI |
Taille de dé | 263 mm2 | 263 mm2 |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 1333 MHz | 1333 MHz |
Cache L1 | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
Cache L2 | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
Cache L3 | 8192 KB (shared) | 8192 KB (shared) |
Processus de fabrication | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Température de noyau maximale | 67.9°C | 67.9°C |
Fréquence maximale | 3.46 GHz | 2.93 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
Number of QPI Links | 1 | 1 |
Nombre de fils | 8 | 8 |
Compte de transistor | 731 million | 731 million |
Rangée de tension VID | 0.800V-1.375V | 0.800V-1.375V |
Mémoire |
||
Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 3 | 3 |
Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
Taille de mémore maximale | 24 GB | 24 GB |
Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3 800/1066 | DDR3 800/1066 |
Compatibilité |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 42.5mm x 45.0mm | 42.5mm x 45.0mm |
Prise courants soutenu | FCLGA1366 | FCLGA1366 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 130 Watt |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
Idle States | ||
Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.2 |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | 36-bit |
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |