Intel Core i7-9700KF versus Intel Core i5-5675C
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core i7-9700KF et Intel Core i5-5675C pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i7-9700KF
- 4 plus de noyaux, lancer plus d’applications á la fois: 8 versus 4
- 4 plus de fils: 8 versus 4
- Environ 36% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 4.90 GHz versus 3.60 GHz
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 128 GB versus 32 GB
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 2875 versus 2234
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 14256 versus 5606
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1304 versus 989
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 7379 versus 3577
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.416 versus 3.323
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 195.33 versus 75.856
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.2 versus 0.432
- 10.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 6.168 versus 0.601
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 17.505 versus 6.401
Caractéristiques | |
Nombre de noyaux | 8 versus 4 |
Nombre de fils | 8 versus 4 |
Fréquence maximale | 4.90 GHz versus 3.60 GHz |
Taille de mémore maximale | 128 GB versus 32 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 2875 versus 2234 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 14256 versus 5606 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1304 versus 989 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 7379 versus 3577 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.416 versus 3.323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 195.33 versus 75.856 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 versus 0.432 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.168 versus 0.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.505 versus 6.401 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i5-5675C
- Environ 46% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 65 Watt versus 95 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt versus 95 Watt |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core i7-9700KF
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-5675C
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Nom | Intel Core i7-9700KF | Intel Core i5-5675C |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 2875 | 2234 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 14256 | 5606 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1304 | 989 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 7379 | 3577 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 5878 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.416 | 3.323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 195.33 | 75.856 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 | 0.432 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.168 | 0.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.505 | 6.401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3147 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3649 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3147 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3649 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel Core i7-9700KF | Intel Core i5-5675C | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Nom de code de l’architecture | Coffee Lake | Broadwell |
Date de sortie | Q1'19 | Q2'15 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1279 | 1272 |
Processor Number | i7-9700KF | i5-5675C |
Série | 9th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors | 5th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors |
Status | Launched | Launched |
Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Base frequency | 3.60 GHz | 3.10 GHz |
Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | 5 GT/s DMI2 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Température de noyau maximale | 100°C | |
Fréquence maximale | 4.90 GHz | 3.60 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 8 | 4 |
Nombre de fils | 8 | 4 |
Mémoire |
||
Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 41.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
Taille de mémore maximale | 128 GB | 32 GB |
Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4-2666 | DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V |
Compatibilité |
||
Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
Prise courants soutenu | FCLGA1151 | FCLGA1150 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
Thermal Solution | PCG 2015D (130W) | PCA 2013D |
Configurable TDP-down | 37 W | |
Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 2.10 GHz | |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Périphériques |
||
Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 16 | 16 |
Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 |
Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
Intel® OS Guard | ||
Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Secure Boot | ||
Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
Idle States | ||
Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
Intel® TSX-NI | ||
Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) | ||
Graphiques |
||
Device ID | 0x1622 | |
eDRAM | 128 MB | |
Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.10 GHz | |
Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 32 GB | |
Graphiques du processeur | Intel® Iris® Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
DisplayPort | ||
DVI | ||
eDP | ||
HDMI | ||
Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | |
VGA | ||
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
Résolution maximale sur eDP | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
Résolution maximale sur VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | |
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
DirectX | 11.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.3 |