Intel Core i9-10850K versus Intel Pentium Gold G5400T
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core i9-10850K et Intel Pentium Gold G5400T pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i9-10850K
- 8 plus de noyaux, lancer plus d’applications á la fois: 10 versus 2
- 16 plus de fils: 20 versus 4
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 128 GB versus 64 GB
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 3079 versus 1786
- 7.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 22443 versus 3110
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2107 versus 1145
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2107 versus 1145
| Caractéristiques | |
| Nombre de noyaux | 10 versus 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 20 versus 4 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 128 GB versus 64 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 3079 versus 1786 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 22443 versus 3110 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2107 versus 1145 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2107 versus 1145 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Pentium Gold G5400T
- 3.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 125 Watt
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2273 versus 1228
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2273 versus 1228
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4260 versus 2139
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4260 versus 2139
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 125 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2273 versus 1228 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2273 versus 1228 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4260 versus 2139 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4260 versus 2139 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core i9-10850K
CPU 2: Intel Pentium Gold G5400T
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Core i9-10850K | Intel Pentium Gold G5400T |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 3079 | 1786 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 22443 | 3110 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 8802 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2107 | 1145 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2107 | 1145 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1228 | 2273 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1228 | 2273 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2139 | 4260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2139 | 4260 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Core i9-10850K | Intel Pentium Gold G5400T | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Comet Lake | Coffee Lake |
| Date de sortie | 18 Aug 2020 | Q2'18 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $453 - $464 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1089 | 1081 |
| Processor Number | i9-10850K | G5400T |
| Série | 10th Generation Intel Core i9 Processors | Intel® Pentium® Gold Processor Series |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 3.60 GHz | 3.10 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s DMI3 |
| Cache L3 | 20 MB | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 100°C | 100/88°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 5.20 GHz | |
| Nombre de noyaux | 10 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 20 | 4 |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 45.8 GB/s | 37.5 GB/s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2400 |
Graphiques |
||
| Device ID | 0x9BC5 | 0x3E90/x93 |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.20 GHz | 1.05 GHz |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel® UHD Graphics 610 |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | 3 |
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Soutien de la resolution 4K | ||
| Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Résolution maximale sur eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2160@30Hz | 4096x2304@24Hz |
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Compatibilité |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 95 Watt | 25 W |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 3.30 GHz | 2.10 GHz |
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCLGA1200 | FCLGA1151 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015D | PCG 2015A (35W) |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 16 | 16 |
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® Thermal Velocity Boost | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Core i9-10850K avec des autres
IntelCore i9-10850K vs
IntelCeleron G1830
IntelCore i9-10850K vs
IntelCore i7-6700T
IntelCore i9-10850K vs
AMDA6-9500
IntelCore i9-10850K vs
AMDAthlon 200GE
IntelCore i9-10850K vs
AMDRyzen 5 3600
IntelCore i9-10850K vs
IntelPentium Gold G6405T
