Intel Pentium G3240 versus AMD A4-5300B
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Pentium G3240 et AMD A4-5300B pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Pentium G3240
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 22 nm versus 32 nm
- Environ 23% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 53 Watt versus 65 Watt
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1747 versus 1237
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 1938 versus 1230
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 619 versus 403
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1101 versus 622
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 614 versus 327
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1698 versus 1142
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2835 versus 2537
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 614 versus 327
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1698 versus 1142
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2835 versus 2537
| Caractéristiques | |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 32 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt versus 65 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1747 versus 1237 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1938 versus 1230 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 619 versus 403 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1101 versus 622 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 614 versus 327 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1698 versus 1142 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2835 versus 2537 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 614 versus 327 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1698 versus 1142 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2835 versus 2537 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Pentium G3240
CPU 2: AMD A4-5300B
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Pentium G3240 | AMD A4-5300B |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1747 | 1237 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1938 | 1230 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 619 | 403 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1101 | 622 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.408 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30.618 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.253 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.942 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.832 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 614 | 327 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1698 | 1142 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2835 | 2537 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 614 | 327 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1698 | 1142 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2835 | 2537 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Pentium G3240 | AMD A4-5300B | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Haswell | Trinity |
| Date de sortie | Q2'14 | October 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2120 | 2125 |
| Processor Number | G3240 | |
| Série | Intel® Pentium® Processor G Series | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 3.10 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 32 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 72°C | |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 2 | |
| Taille de dé | 246 mm | |
| Cache L1 | 128 KB (per core) | |
| Cache L2 | 1024 KB (per core) | |
| Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 70 °C | |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.4 GHz | |
| Compte de transistor | 1178 million | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 21.3 GB/s | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB | |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3-1333, DDR3L-1333 @ 1.5V | DDR3 |
Graphiques |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.10 GHz | |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 1.7 GB | |
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel HD Graphics | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | |
| VGA | ||
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 2560x1600@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur eDP | 2560x1600@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 1920x1080@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | |
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 11.1/12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCLGA1150 | FM2 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2013C | |
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 16 | |
| Révision PCI Express | Up to 3.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Pentium G3240 avec des autres
IntelPentium G3240 vs
AMDPhenom X4 9150e
IntelPentium G3240 vs
AMDFX-6120
IntelPentium G3240 vs
AMDA4-5300B
IntelPentium G3240 vs
IntelCore i3-3210
IntelPentium G3240 vs
IntelCore i5-6600T
IntelPentium G3240 vs
IntelCeleron G3900
