Intel Pentium Gold G5400 versus Intel Core i3-2350M
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Pentium Gold G5400 et Intel Core i3-2350M pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Pentium Gold G5400
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 6 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 61% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.7 GHz versus 2.3 GHz
- Environ 18% température maximale du noyau plus haut: 100°C versus 85C (PGA); 100C (BGA)
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 14 nm versus 32 nm
- 2x plus de la cache L3, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L3 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 64 GB versus 16 GB
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 2191 versus 971
- 3x meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 3739 versus 1256
- 2.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 912 versus 386
- 2.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2007 versus 848
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.695 versus 1.442
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 42.899 versus 26.392
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.305 versus 0.177
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.337 versus 0.689
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.324 versus 1.665
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | January 2018 versus 15 May 2011 |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.7 GHz versus 2.3 GHz |
| Température de noyau maximale | 100°C versus 85C (PGA); 100C (BGA) |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 32 nm |
| Cache L3 | 6144 KB (shared) versus 3 MB |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB versus 16 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2191 versus 971 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3739 versus 1256 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 912 versus 386 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2007 versus 848 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.695 versus 1.442 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 42.899 versus 26.392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.305 versus 0.177 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.337 versus 0.689 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.324 versus 1.665 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i3-2350M
- Environ 66% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 58 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 58 Watt |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Pentium Gold G5400
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-2350M
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Pentium Gold G5400 | Intel Core i3-2350M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2191 | 971 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3739 | 1256 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 912 | 386 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2007 | 848 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.695 | 1.442 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 42.899 | 26.392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.305 | 0.177 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.337 | 0.689 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.324 | 1.665 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1108 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1809 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3401 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1108 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1809 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3401 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Pentium Gold G5400 | Intel Core i3-2350M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Coffee Lake | Sandy Bridge |
| Date de sortie | January 2018 | 15 May 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1972 | 3100 |
| Prix maintenant | $127.90 | $41.97 |
| Processor Number | G5400 | i3-2350M |
| Série | Intel® Pentium® Gold Processor Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 12.06 | 18.37 |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Mobile |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $225 | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 3.70 GHz | 2.30 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | 5 GT/s DMI |
| Cache L1 | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| Cache L2 | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
| Cache L3 | 6144 KB (shared) | 3 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 72 °C | |
| Température de noyau maximale | 100°C | 85C (PGA); 100C (BGA) |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.7 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | 4 |
| Taille de dé | 149 mm | |
| Compte de transistor | 624 Million | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 37.5 GB/s | 21.3 GB/s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4-2400 | DDR3 1066/1333 |
Graphiques |
||
| Device ID | 0x3E90/x93 | 0x116 |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.05 GHz | 1.15 GHz |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 64 GB | |
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel® UHD Graphics 610 | Intel® HD Graphics 3000 |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 1.15 GHz | |
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | 2 |
| CRT | ||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| SDVO | ||
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Soutien de la resolution 4K | ||
| Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm (rPGA988B); 31mm x 24mm (BGA1023) |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCLGA1151 | PPGA988 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 58 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C (65W) | |
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 16 | 16 |
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® AVX |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Technologie Intel® My WiFi | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Pentium Gold G5400 avec des autres
IntelPentium Gold G5400 vs
AMDPhenom II X2 B57
IntelPentium Gold G5400 vs
IntelCore i3-4150T
IntelPentium Gold G5400 vs
IntelCore i3-6320
IntelPentium Gold G5400 vs
IntelCore i5-7400T
IntelPentium Gold G5400 vs
AMDRyzen 5 1400
IntelPentium Gold G5400 vs
AMDAthlon X4 850
