Intel UHD Graphics 770 versus AMD Radeon Vega 11
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 770 and AMD Radeon Vega 11 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Soutien API, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 770
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 12% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1450 MHz versus 1300 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 23.20 GTexel/s versus 57.2 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 14 nm
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 35 Watt
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 532 versus 478
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1908 versus 1857
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.442 versus 41.582
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1011.7 versus 371.843
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 4 Nov 2021 versus 13 February 2018 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1450 MHz versus 1300 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 23.20 GTexel/s versus 57.2 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 35 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 versus 478 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1908 versus 1857 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.442 versus 41.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1011.7 versus 371.843 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 11
- 2.8x plus de pipelines: 704 versus 256
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 13318 versus 7628
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.156 versus 2.846
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.449 versus 40.941
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 248.838 versus 94.384
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 704 versus 256 |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13318 versus 7628 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.156 versus 2.846 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.449 versus 40.941 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 248.838 versus 94.384 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 770
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega 11
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | AMD Radeon Vega 11 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 | 478 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1908 | 1857 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7628 | 13318 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.442 | 41.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1011.7 | 371.843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.846 | 3.156 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.941 | 52.449 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.384 | 248.838 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 72 | 0 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2156 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2475 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2156 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2475 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 770 | AMD Radeon Vega 11 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.2 | GCN 5.0 |
Nom de code | Alder Lake GT1 | Owl |
Date de sortie | 4 Nov 2021 | 13 February 2018 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 832 | 886 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1450 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 32 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 185.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1485 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 742.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 256 | 704 |
Pixel fill rate | 11.60 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 23.20 GTexel/s | 57.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Performance á point flottant | 1,830 gflops | |
Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Mémoire |
||
Genre de mémoire | System Shared |