Intel UHD Graphics 770 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 770 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Soutien API, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 770
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 34% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1450 MHz versus 1085 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 23.20 GTexel/s versus 43.4 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 28 nm
- 4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 60 Watt
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 532 versus 521
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.442 versus 42.463
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1011.7 versus 642.715
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.941 versus 26.532
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 4 Nov 2021 versus 18 February 2014 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1450 MHz versus 1085 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 23.20 GTexel/s versus 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 60 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 versus 521 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.442 versus 42.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1011.7 versus 642.715 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.941 versus 26.532 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- 3.4x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1020 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 2.5x plus de pipelines: 640 versus 256
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 versus 1908
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 versus 7628
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 versus 2.846
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 versus 94.384
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 117 versus 72
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 256 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 versus 1908 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 versus 7628 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 versus 2.846 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 versus 94.384 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 117 versus 72 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 770
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 | 521 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1908 | 3901 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7628 | 11526 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.442 | 42.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1011.7 | 642.715 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.846 | 2.933 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.941 | 26.532 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.384 | 133.458 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 72 | 117 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 770 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.2 | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | Alder Lake GT1 | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 4 Nov 2021 | 18 February 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 832 | 707 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Prix maintenant | $299.01 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.02 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1450 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 32 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 185.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1485 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 742.4 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 256 | 640 |
| Pixel fill rate | 11.60 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 23.20 GTexel/s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,389 gflops | |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 86.4 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5.4 GB/s | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 770 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 770 vs
NVIDIAQuadro4 380 XGL
IntelUHD Graphics 770 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7600
IntelUHD Graphics 770 vs
ATIFirePro 2260 PCI
IntelUHD Graphics 770 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 570X
IntelUHD Graphics 770 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645
IntelUHD Graphics 770 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 9
