Intel UHD Graphics 770 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 770 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Soutien API, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 770
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- 13.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 200 Watt
Date de sortie | 4 Nov 2021 versus 1 Dec 2020 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 200 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- 4.7x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1410 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 15% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1450 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 253.1 GTexel/s versus 23.20 GTexel/s
- 19x plus de pipelines: 4864 versus 256
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 10 nm
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 versus 532
- 10.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 versus 1908
- 14.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 versus 7628
- 7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 versus 46.442
- 4.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 versus 1011.7
- 12.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 versus 2.846
- 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 versus 40.941
- 15.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 versus 94.384
- 37.1x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 versus 72
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1450 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s versus 23.20 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 4864 versus 256 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 10 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 versus 532 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 versus 1908 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 versus 7628 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 versus 46.442 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 versus 1011.7 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 versus 2.846 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 versus 40.941 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 versus 94.384 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 versus 72 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 770
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 | 989 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1908 | 20394 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7628 | 109075 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.442 | 323.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1011.7 | 4756.579 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.846 | 35.311 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.941 | 150.943 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.384 | 1474.189 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 72 | 2671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 770 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.2 | Ampere |
Nom de code | Alder Lake GT1 | GA104 |
Date de sortie | 4 Nov 2021 | 1 Dec 2020 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 832 | 104 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1450 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 32 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1410 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 185.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1485 GFLOPS (2:1) | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 742.4 GFLOPS | 16.20 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 256 | 4864 |
Pixel fill rate | 11.60 GPixel/s | 133.2 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 23.20 GTexel/s | 253.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 200 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 |