NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 12% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 823 MHz versus 732 MHz
- Environ 20% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 52.7 GTexel / s versus 43.92 GTexel / s
- Environ 29% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 170 Watt versus 219 Watt
- Environ 5% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 4008 MHz versus 3800 MHz
Date de sortie | 25 January 2011 versus 7 December 2010 |
Vitesse du noyau | 823 MHz versus 732 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.7 GTexel / s versus 43.92 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt versus 219 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4008 MHz versus 3800 MHz |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 480 versus 384
- Environ 11% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,405 gflops versus 1,263.4 gflops
- Environ 25% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 1280 MB versus 1 GB
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.499 versus 31.935
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 674.215 versus 539.966
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.967 versus 2.344
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 36.208 versus 35.841
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 123.354 versus 64.308
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5405 versus 4184
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 versus 3683
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 3333
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5405 versus 4184
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 versus 3683
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 3333
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 480 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,405 gflops versus 1,263.4 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 1280 MB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.499 versus 31.935 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 674.215 versus 539.966 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.967 versus 2.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.208 versus 35.841 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 123.354 versus 64.308 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5405 versus 4184 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 versus 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5405 versus 4184 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 versus 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3333 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3051 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 429 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10715 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.935 | 36.499 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 539.966 | 674.215 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.344 | 3.967 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.841 | 36.208 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 64.308 | 123.354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4184 | 5405 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 3705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4184 | 5405 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 3705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 389 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | GF114 | GF110 |
Date de sortie | 25 January 2011 | 7 December 2010 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $249 | $349 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 819 | 820 |
Prix maintenant | $138 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 27.88 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 823 MHz | 732 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,263.4 gflops | 1,405 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.7 GTexel / s | 43.92 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 219 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,950 million | 3,000 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 229 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1280 MB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 128.3 GB / s | 152.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 320 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4008 MHz | 3800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |