NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 97% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 49.41 GTexel / s versus 25.1 billion / sec
- 2.7x plus de pipelines: 512 versus 192
- 2.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,581 gflops versus 601.3 gflops
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 1536 MB versus 1 GB
- 2.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4008 MHz versus 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.212 versus 14.758
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 914.386 versus 302.509
- 5.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.262 versus 0.965
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 43.391 versus 14.925
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.735 versus 27.656
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 6 June 2011 versus 13 September 2010 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 49.41 GTexel / s versus 25.1 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 512 versus 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,581 gflops versus 601.3 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 1536 MB versus 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4008 MHz versus 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.212 versus 14.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 914.386 versus 302.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.262 versus 0.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.391 versus 14.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.735 versus 27.656 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- 2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1566 MHz versus 772 MHz
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 106 Watt versus 244 Watt
Vitesse du noyau | 1566 MHz versus 772 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 106 Watt versus 244 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.212 | 14.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 914.386 | 302.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.262 | 0.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.391 | 14.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.735 | 27.656 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1317 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 306 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4931 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2160 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3365 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2160 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3365 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
Nom de code | GF110 | GF106 |
Date de sortie | 6 June 2011 | 13 September 2010 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | $129 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1145 | 1146 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $64.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 26.46 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 772 MHz | 1566 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,581 gflops | 601.3 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 49.41 GTexel / s | 25.1 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 244 Watt | 106 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 1,170 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 100 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 6-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1536 MB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.4 GB / s | 57.7 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4008 MHz | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI |