NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 27% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 11008 MHz
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 21601 versus 18598
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 134929 versus 67670
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 394.035 versus 205.837
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5461.22 versus 2406.499
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.104 versus 19.591
- 6.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 174.185 versus 25.833
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1987.605 versus 1002.573
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23659 versus 15019
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23659 versus 15019
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3537 versus 2231
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 20 September 2018 versus 10 March 2017 |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 11008 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21601 versus 18598 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 134929 versus 67670 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 394.035 versus 205.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 versus 2406.499 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.104 versus 19.591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 174.185 versus 25.833 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1987.605 versus 1002.573 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23659 versus 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23659 versus 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3537 versus 2231 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- Environ 10% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1481 MHz versus 1350 MHz
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1582 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 937 versus 928
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1481 MHz versus 1350 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 937 versus 928 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21601 | 18598 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 928 | 937 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 134929 | 67670 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 394.035 | 205.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 | 2406.499 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.104 | 19.591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 174.185 | 25.833 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1987.605 | 1002.573 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23659 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23659 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3537 | 2231 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Nom de code | TU102 | GP102 |
Date de sortie | 20 September 2018 | 10 March 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $999 | $699 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 91 | 219 |
Prix maintenant | $1,279.99 | $826.98 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.22 | 27.48 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz | 1481 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 18,600 million | 11,800 million |
Performance á point flottant | 11,340 gflops | |
Température maximale du GPU | 91 °C | |
Pipelines | 3584 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 354.4 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 11008 MHz |
RAM maximale | 11 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 484.4 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 352 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5X | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |