Intel UHD Graphics 730 versus Intel UHD Graphics 630
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 730 and Intel UHD Graphics 630 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 730
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 8% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1300 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 15.60 GTexel/s versus 28.8 GTexel / s
- 8x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 24
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1573 versus 1237
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 412 versus 299
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5967 versus 4657
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2429 versus 1870
- 3.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5221 versus 1596
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2429 versus 1870
- 3.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5221 versus 1596
- 8.9x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 603 versus 68
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2021 versus 1 September 2017 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.60 GTexel/s versus 28.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 192 versus 24 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1573 versus 1237 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 412 versus 299 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5967 versus 4657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2429 versus 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5221 versus 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2429 versus 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5221 versus 1596 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 603 versus 68 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Environ 17% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 350 MHz versus 300 MHz
| Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 730
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 730 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1573 | 1237 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 412 | 299 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5967 | 4657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2429 | 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5221 | 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2429 | 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5221 | 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3309 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 603 | 68 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 730 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Generation 9.5 |
| Nom de code | Rocket Lake GT1 | Coffee Lake GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 2021 | 1 September 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 633 | 1234 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 24 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 998.4 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 192 | 24 |
| Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.60 GTexel/s | 28.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 730 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1300
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
ATIFireGL V3100
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1500M
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
ATIRadeon X1600 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
ATIFirePro V9800
IntelUHD Graphics 730 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 500M
