AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) vs NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) and NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 18 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 3142.9x more texture fill rate: 17.60 GTexel/s vs 5.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 130 nm
- 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 67 Watt
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 257 vs 212
- 7.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1099 vs 142
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 Jan 2023 vs 14 April 2004 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 GTexel/s vs 5.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 130 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 67 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 257 vs 212 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1099 vs 142 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) | NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4927 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 257 | 212 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1099 | 142 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) | NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Curie |
Code name | Dragon Range | NV40 A1 |
Launch date | 3 Jan 2023 | 14 April 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 846 | 807 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2200 MHz | |
Compute units | 2 | |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 130 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 35.20 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1,126 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 563.2 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 128 | |
Pixel fill rate | 8.800 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 GTexel/s | 5.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 67 Watt |
Transistor count | 222 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x Molex |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 9.0c |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 32.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 700 MHz |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR3 |