AMD ROG Ally Extreme vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
Comparative analysis of AMD ROG Ally Extreme and NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD ROG Ally Extreme
- Videocard is newer: launch date 18 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 6x more boost clock speed: 2700 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 24000x more texture fill rate: 129.6 GTexel/s vs 5.4 GTexel / s
- 64x more pipelines: 768 vs 12
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 130 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 89 Watt
- 64x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective vs 1200 MHz
Launch date | 13 Jun 2023 vs 24 February 2005 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2700 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 129.6 GTexel/s vs 5.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 12 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 130 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 89 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective vs 1200 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD ROG Ally Extreme
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
Name | AMD ROG Ally Extreme | NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2837 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 138 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 198 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD ROG Ally Extreme | NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Curie |
Code name | Phoenix | NV41 |
Launch date | 13 Jun 2023 | 24 February 2005 |
Place in performance rating | 870 | 881 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2700 MHz | 450 MHz |
Compute units | 12 | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 450 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 12 |
Pixel fill rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 129.6 GTexel/s | 5.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 89 Watt |
Transistor count | 25390 million | 222 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 21 mm, 0.8 inches | |
Length | 280 mm, 11 inches | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | 111 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 9.0c |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.20 GB/s | 38.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 600 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | 256 |
Shared memory | 0 |