NVIDIA T400 4GB vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T400 4GB and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T400 4GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 79.7x more texture fill rate: 34.20 GTexel/s vs 429.3 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 7.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 225 Watt
Launch date | 6 May 2021 vs 8 August 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s vs 429.3 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1406 MHz vs 420 MHz
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1677 MHz vs 1425 MHz
- 10.7x more pipelines: 4096 vs 384
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 51% higher memory clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
Core clock speed | 1406 MHz vs 420 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1677 MHz vs 1425 MHz |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 384 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T400 4GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
Name | NVIDIA T400 4GB | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 644 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3719 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17141 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7765 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA T400 4GB | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | TU117 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 6 May 2021 | 8 August 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 255 | 256 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 1677 MHz |
Core clock speed | 420 MHz | 1406 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 22.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s | 429.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | |
Floating-point performance | 13,738 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.00 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | 1890 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |