NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

• Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1635 MHz vs 1515 MHz
• Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 2115 MHz vs 1710 MHz
• Around 4% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2944
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 12 nm
• 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 215 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

• 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
• Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 912 vs 628
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18811 vs 15540
• Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 102535 vs 79664

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	628 912
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	15540 18811
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	79664 102535

Compare specifications (specs)