NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

• Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1635 MHz vs 1515 MHz
• Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 2115 MHz vs 1710 MHz
• Around 4% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2944
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 12 nm
• 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 215 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

• 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
• Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 912 vs 627
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18813 vs 15585
• Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 102535 vs 79625

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	627 912
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	15585 18813
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	79625 102535

Compare specifications (specs)