Intel Celeron N3350 Prozessorbewertung
Celeron N3350 Prozessor herausgegeben durch Intel; Erscheinungsdatum: 1 September 2016. Zum Zeitpunkt der Veröffentlichung kostete der Prozessor $107. Der Prozessor ist für mobile-Rechner ausgelegt und basiert auf der Mikroarchitektur Apollo Lake.
Die CPU ist gesperrt, um eine Übertaktung zu verhindern. Gesamtzahl der Kerne - 2, Kanäle - 2. Maximale CPU-Taktfrequenz - 2.40 GHz. Maximale Betriebstemperatur - 105°C. Fertigungsprozesstechnik- 14 nm. Cache Größe: L2 - 2 MB.
Unterstützte Speichertypen: DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Maximale Speichergröße: 8 GB.
Unterstützte Socket-Typen: FCBGA1296. Maximale Anzahl von Prozessoren in einer Konfiguration - 1. Stromverbrauch (TDP): 6 Watt.
Der Prozessor verfügt über integrierte Grafiken Intel® HD Graphics 500 mit den folgenden Parametern: Maximale Frequenz - 650 MHz, Maximale Videospeichergröße - 8 GB.
Benchmarks
| PassMark Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 T-Rex |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Car Chase Offscreen |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 Manhattan |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 T-Rex |
|
|
| Name | Wert |
|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 801 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1107 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 290 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 530 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen | 446 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan | 1140 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex | 1444 Frames |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen | 446.000 Fps |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan | 1140.000 Fps |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex | 1444.000 Fps |
Integrierte Grafik – Intel HD Graphics 500
Technische Info |
|
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 750 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 200 MHz |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 144.0 gflops |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 12 |
| Texturfüllrate | 9 GTexel / s |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 6 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 189 million |
Leistung der Spiele
1. Valorant (2020)
2. Hearthstone (2020)
3. Counter-Strike: GO (2012)
4. League of Legends (2019)
5. World of Tanks enCore (2018)
6. Assassin's Creed Odyssey (2018)
7. Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)
8. F1 2018 (2018)
9. The Crew 2 (2018)
10. Far Cry 5 (2018)
11. X-Plane 11.11 (2018)
12. Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017)
13. Team Fortress 2 (2017)
14. Dirt 4 (2017)
15. Rocket League (2017)
16. Prey (2017)
2. Hearthstone (2020)
3. Counter-Strike: GO (2012)
4. League of Legends (2019)
5. World of Tanks enCore (2018)
6. Assassin's Creed Odyssey (2018)
7. Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)
8. F1 2018 (2018)
9. The Crew 2 (2018)
10. Far Cry 5 (2018)
11. X-Plane 11.11 (2018)
12. Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017)
13. Team Fortress 2 (2017)
14. Dirt 4 (2017)
15. Rocket League (2017)
16. Prey (2017)
17. For Honor (2017)
18. Overwatch (2016)
19. Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
20. World of Warships (2015)
21. Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
22. Dirt Rally (2015)
23. Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014)
24. Sims 4 (2014)
25. BioShock Infinite (2013)
26. Tomb Raider (2013)
27. Diablo III (2012)
28. The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
29. Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011)
30. StarCraft 2 (2010)
31. Trackmania Nations Forever (2008)
32. World of Warcraft (2005)
18. Overwatch (2016)
19. Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
20. World of Warships (2015)
21. Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
22. Dirt Rally (2015)
23. Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014)
24. Sims 4 (2014)
25. BioShock Infinite (2013)
26. Tomb Raider (2013)
27. Diablo III (2012)
28. The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
29. Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011)
30. StarCraft 2 (2010)
31. Trackmania Nations Forever (2008)
32. World of Warcraft (2005)
Valorant (2020)
| Low, 1280x720 | 9.09 |
Hearthstone (2020)
| Low, 1920x1080 | 23.90 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 24.00 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 11.20 |
Counter-Strike: GO (2012)
| Low, 1024x768 | 15.30 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 14.00 |
League of Legends (2019)
| Low, 1280x720 | 28.20 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 20.20 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 13.90 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 12.60 |
World of Tanks enCore (2018)
| Low, 1366x768 | 34.40 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 4.60 |
Assassin's Creed Odyssey (2018)
| Low, 1280x720 | 2.00 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)
| Low, 1280x720 | 3.00 |
F1 2018 (2018)
| Low, 1280x720 | 12.00 |
The Crew 2 (2018)
| Low, 1280x720 | 5.50 |
Far Cry 5 (2018)
| Low, 1280x720 | 1.00 |
| QHD, 2560x1440 | 1.00 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)
| Low, 1280x720 | 5.50 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 4.32 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 3.96 |
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017)
| Low, 1280x720 | 10.00 |
Team Fortress 2 (2017)
| Low, 1280x720 | 19.70 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 17.20 |
Dirt 4 (2017)
| Low, 1280x720 | 10.00 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 5.60 |
Rocket League (2017)
| Low, 1280x720 | 18.10 |
| Medium, 1920x1080 | 6.20 |
Prey (2017)
| Low, 1280x720 | 4.90 |
For Honor (2017)
| Low, 1280x720 | 8.70 |
Overwatch (2016)
| Low, 1280x720 | 15.90 |
Rainbow Six Siege (2015)
| Low, 1024x768 | 15.50 |
World of Warships (2015)
| Low, 1366x768 | 19.10 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
| Low, 1280x720 | 22.10 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 15.30 |
| High, 1920x1080 | 5.60 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 5.10 |
Dirt Rally (2015)
| Low, 1024x768 | 28.50 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 12.50 |
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014)
| Low, 1280x720 | 17.70 |
Sims 4 (2014)
| Low, 1024x768 | 71.60 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 13.70 |
BioShock Infinite (2013)
| Low, 1280x720 | 21.00 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 9.83 |
| High, 1366x768 | 8.89 |
| Ultra, 1920x1080 | 2.70 |
Tomb Raider (2013)
| Low, 1024x768 | 21.50 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 9.30 |
Diablo III (2012)
| Low, 1024x768 | 17.35 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 13.60 |
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)
| Low, 1280x720 | 11.20 |
| Medium, 1366x768 | 7.60 |
Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011)
| Low, 1024x768 | 22.90 |
| High, 1366x768 | 11.10 |
StarCraft 2 (2010)
| Low, 1024x768 | 54.50 |
| Medium, 1360x768 | 14.10 |
Trackmania Nations Forever (2008)
| Low, 640x480 | 119.00 |
| High, 1024x768 | 27.20 |
World of Warcraft (2005)
| Low, 800x600 | 46.00 |
Spezifikationen
Essenzielles |
|
| Architektur Codename | Apollo Lake |
| Startdatum | 1 September 2016 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $107 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 2511 |
| Processor Number | N3350 |
| Serie | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series |
| Status | Launched |
| Vertikales Segment | Mobile |
Leistung |
|
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | |
| Base frequency | 1.10 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 105°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 2.40 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 2 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 2 |
Speicher |
|
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 8 GB |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s |
Grafik |
|
| Device ID | 0x5A85 |
| Ausführungseinheiten | 12 |
| Graphics base frequency | 200 MHz |
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 650 MHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | |
| Intel® Clear Video Technologie | |
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | |
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | |
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 8 GB |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel® HD Graphics 500 |
Grafikschnittstellen |
|
| DisplayPort | |
| eDP | |
| HDMI | |
| MIPI-DSI | |
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 |
| Unterstützung für Wireless Display (WiDi) | |
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
|
| DirectX | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 |
Kompatibilität |
|
| Low Halogen Options Available | |
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 |
| Package Size | 24mm x 31mm |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4 W |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FCBGA1296 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 6 Watt |
Peripherien |
|
| Integriertes LAN | |
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 6 |
| Maximale Anzahl der SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 |
| Anzahl der USB-Ports | 8 |
| PCI Express Revision | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4 + 1x2 or 4x1 or 2x1+1x2 + 1x2 |
| Gesamtzahl der SATA-Anschlüsse | 2 |
| UART | |
| USB-Überarbeitung | 2.0/3.0 |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
|
| Anti-Theft Technologie | |
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | |
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | |
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | |
| Intel® OS Guard | |
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | |
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | |
| Secure Boot | |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
|
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | |
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | |
| HD Audio | |
| Idle States | |
| Intel 64 | |
| Intel® AES New Instructions | |
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | |
| Intel® Rapid Storage Technologie (RST) | |
| Intel® Smart Response Technologie | |
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | |
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | |
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | |
| Smart Connect | |
| Thermal Monitoring | |
Virtualisierung |
|
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | |
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | |
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) | |
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | |
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Celeron N3350 mit anderen
IntelCeleron N3350 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo T5500
IntelCeleron N3350 vs
IntelCore i7-2820QM
IntelCeleron N3350 vs
IntelCore i7-4578U
IntelCeleron N3350 vs
AMDE2-9000e
IntelCeleron N3350 vs
AMDGX-420CA
IntelCeleron N3350 vs
AMDA4-9120e
