AMD A8-7670K vs AMD A10-7890K
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD A8-7670K und AMD A10-7890K Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung, Peripherien. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A8-7670K
- Etwa 43% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1882 vs 1319
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2436 vs 1878
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7326 vs 3188
- Etwa 43% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1882 vs 1319
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2436 vs 1878
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7326 vs 3188
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1882 vs 1319 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2436 vs 1878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7326 vs 3188 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1882 vs 1319 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2436 vs 1878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7326 vs 3188 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A10-7890K
- Etwa 10% höhere Taktfrequenz: 4.3 GHz vs 3.9 GHz
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1566 vs 1485
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 3522 vs 3192
- Etwa 39% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.344 vs 14.634
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 335.352 vs 126.662
- Etwa 56% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.794 vs 1.151
- Etwa 52% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.466 vs 20.723
- Etwa 58% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 106.183 vs 67.072
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 4.3 GHz vs 3.9 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1566 vs 1485 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3522 vs 3192 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.344 vs 14.634 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 335.352 vs 126.662 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.794 vs 1.151 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.466 vs 20.723 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 106.183 vs 67.072 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD A8-7670K
CPU 2: AMD A10-7890K
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD A8-7670K | AMD A10-7890K |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1485 | 1566 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3192 | 3522 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.634 | 20.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 126.662 | 335.352 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.151 | 1.794 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.723 | 31.466 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.072 | 106.183 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1882 | 1319 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2436 | 1878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7326 | 3188 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1882 | 1319 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2436 | 1878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7326 | 3188 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD A8-7670K | AMD A10-7890K | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | AMD A-Series Processors |
| OPN PIB | AD767KXBJCSBX | AD789KXDJCHBX |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 821 | 829 |
| Serie | AMD A8-Series APU for Desktops | AMD A10-Series APU for Desktops |
| Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Architektur Codename | Kaveri | |
| Startdatum | January 2016 | |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $150 | |
| Jetzt kaufen | $199.99 | |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 8.46 | |
Leistung |
||
| Base frequency | 3.6 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| Compute Cores | 10 | 12 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 72.40°C | 72.40°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.9 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 6 | 8 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | |
| Freigegeben | ||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Matrizengröße | 246 mm | |
| Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 74 °C | |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1178 million | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3 | |
Grafik |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 757 MHz | 866 MHz |
| iGPU Kernzahl | 512 | 512 |
| Prozessorgrafiken | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
| Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Anzahl der Rohrleitungen | 512 | |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
| Unterstützte Sockel | FM2+ | FM2+ |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 95 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | Near Silent 95W | Wraith cooler |
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Peripherien |
||
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | |
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche AMD A8-7670K mit anderen
AMDA8-7670K vs
IntelPentium G3430
AMDA8-7670K vs
IntelCore i3-4330T
AMDA8-7670K vs
AMDA10-7890K
AMDA8-7670K vs
AMDRyzen Threadripper 2950X
AMDA8-7670K vs
AMDRyzen 7 PRO 2700X
AMDA8-7670K vs
IntelCore i9-9900KS
