AMD PRO A12-8830B vs AMD FX-8800P
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD PRO A12-8830B und AMD FX-8800P Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung, Grafikschnittstellen, Peripherien. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD PRO A12-8830B
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 436 vs 406
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1141 vs 1133
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 436 vs 406 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1141 vs 1133 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD FX-8800P
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1380 vs 1321
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 2851 vs 2517
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1380 vs 1321 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2851 vs 2517 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD PRO A12-8830B
CPU 2: AMD FX-8800P
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
| Name | AMD PRO A12-8830B | AMD FX-8800P |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1321 | 1380 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2517 | 2851 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 436 | 406 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1141 | 1133 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.374 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4.785 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.141 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.482 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.544 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1206 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 858 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3132 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1206 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 858 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3132 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD PRO A12-8830B | AMD FX-8800P | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | AMD FX-Series Processors |
| Startdatum | Q3 2016 | 3 June 2015 |
| OPN Tray | AM883BADY44AB | FM880PAAY43KA |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, Windows 7 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, Windows 7 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 2353 | 2356 |
| Serie | AMD PRO A-Series A12 APU for Laptops | AMD FX-Series Processors for AIOs |
| Vertikales Segment | Laptop | All-in-One |
| Architektur Codename | Carrizo | |
Leistung |
||
| Base frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Compute Cores | 10 | 12 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.4 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 6 | 8 |
| Freigegeben | ||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 90°C | |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 3100 Million | |
Speicher |
||
| Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3 | |
Grafik |
||
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 758 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Prozessorgrafiken | R7 | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
| Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
| Enduro | ||
| iGPU Kernzahl | 8 | |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
| Configurable TDP | 12 Watt/15 Watt | |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FP4 | FP4 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Peripherien |
||
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | |
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche AMD PRO A12-8830B mit anderen
AMDPRO A12-8830B vs
AMDTurion X2 Ultra ZM-82
AMDPRO A12-8830B vs
AMDAthlon II N350
AMDPRO A12-8830B vs
IntelCore i3-2332M
AMDPRO A12-8830B vs
IntelCore i7-3555LE
AMDPRO A12-8830B vs
IntelAtom E3827
AMDPRO A12-8830B vs
AMDFX-8800P
