AMD PRO A12-8870 vs AMD PRO A12-9800
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD PRO A12-8870 und AMD PRO A12-9800 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung, Grafikschnittstellen. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD PRO A12-8870
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1816 vs 1686
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 3969 vs 3705
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1816 vs 1686 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3969 vs 3705 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD PRO A12-8870
CPU 2: AMD PRO A12-9800
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD PRO A12-8870 | AMD PRO A12-9800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1816 | 1686 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3969 | 3705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.268 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 279.396 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.975 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.196 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 131.8 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1176 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 477 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1176 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 477 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1715 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD PRO A12-8870 | AMD PRO A12-9800 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | AMD PRO A-Series Processors |
Startdatum | Q3 2016 | 3 October 2016 |
OPN Tray | AD887BAUM44AB | AD980BAUM44AB |
OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, Windows 7 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1323 | 994 |
Serie | AMD PRO A-Series A12 APU for Desktops | AMD PRO A-Series A12 APU for Desktops |
Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Leistung |
||
Base frequency | 3.7 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Maximale Frequenz | 4.2 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
Number of GPU cores | 8 | 8 |
Freigegeben | ||
Maximale Kerntemperatur | 90°C | |
Speicher |
||
Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | 2400 MHz |
Grafik |
||
Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 1108 MHz | 1108 MHz |
Prozessorgrafiken | R7 | R7 |
Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
Enduro | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Vulkan | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
Unterstützte Sockel | AM4 | AM4 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Peripherien |
||
PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
FreeSync | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
AMD Secure technology | ||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
Out-of-band client management | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
PowerTune | ||
System Image Stability | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI |