AMD Ryzen 3 2300U vs AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Ryzen 3 2300U und AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Ryzen 3 2300U
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 3 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.001 vs 21.798
- Etwa 35% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 376.289 vs 279.682
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.94 vs 1.746
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 29.592 vs 27.185
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 8 January 2018 vs October 2017 |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.001 vs 21.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 376.289 vs 279.682 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.94 vs 1.746 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.592 vs 27.185 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1832 vs 1745
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 5742 vs 5548
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 96.109 vs 90.909
- Etwa 37% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4594 vs 3348
- Etwa 37% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4594 vs 3348
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1832 vs 1745 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 5742 vs 5548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 96.109 vs 90.909 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4594 vs 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4594 vs 3348 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 3 2300U
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Ryzen 3 2300U | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1745 | 1832 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 5548 | 5742 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 724 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2237 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.001 | 21.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 376.289 | 279.682 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.94 | 1.746 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.592 | 27.185 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 90.909 | 96.109 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 4594 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 4594 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1321 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1384 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1321 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1384 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur Codename | Zen | Raven Ridge |
Family | AMD Ryzen Processors | AMD Ryzen PRO Processors |
Startdatum | 8 January 2018 | October 2017 |
OPN Tray | YM2300C4T4MFB | YM230BC4T4MFB |
OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 890 | 928 |
Serie | AMD Ryzen 3 Mobile Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO Mobile Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics |
Vertikales Segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Leistung |
||
64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
Base frequency | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
Matrizengröße | 246 mm | 246 mm |
L1 Cache | 384 KB | 384 KB |
L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
L3 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Maximale Kerntemperatur | 95°C | 95°C |
Maximale Frequenz | 3.4 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
Number of GPU cores | 6 | 6 |
Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 4 |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 4500 Million | |
Freigegeben | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | 2400 MHz |
Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Grafik |
||
Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 1100 MHz | 1100 MHz |
iGPU Kernzahl | 6 | 6 |
Prozessorgrafiken | Radeon Vega 6 Graphics | Radeon Vega 6 Graphics |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
DirectX | 12 | |
Kompatibilität |
||
Configurable TDP | 12-25 Watt | 12-25 Watt |
Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
Unterstützte Sockel | FP5 | FP5 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Thermal Solution | Not included | Not included |
Peripherien |
||
PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
AMD SenseMI | ||
FreeSync | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
The "Zen" Core Architecture | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |