AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE und AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE
- Etwa 86% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
- 4 Mehr Kanäle: 8 vs 4
- Etwa 8% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.9 GHz vs 3.6 GHz
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2149 vs 2059
- Etwa 33% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 8562 vs 6457
- Etwa 48% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.509 vs 28.715
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 393.562 vs 387.896
- Etwa 27% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.082 vs 2.419
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.002 vs 40.816
- Etwa 55% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 208.928 vs 134.646
| Spezifikationen | |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 8 vs 4 |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.9 GHz vs 3.6 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2149 vs 2059 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 8562 vs 6457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.509 vs 28.715 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 393.562 vs 387.896 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 vs 2.419 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.002 vs 40.816 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 208.928 vs 134.646 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2059 | 2149 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 6457 | 8562 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.715 | 42.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 387.896 | 393.562 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.419 | 3.082 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.816 | 49.002 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 134.646 | 208.928 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1858 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1994 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5566 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1858 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1994 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5566 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Family | AMD Ryzen PRO Processors | AMD Ryzen PRO Processors |
| Startdatum | 10 May 2018 | 10 May 2018 |
| OPN Tray | YD2200C6M4MFB | YD240BC5M4MFB |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 218 | 241 |
| Serie | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO Desktop Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO Desktop Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics |
| Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Architektur Codename | Raven Ridge | |
Leistung |
||
| Basistaktfrequenz | 3.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm FinFET | 14 nm FinFET |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 95°C | 95°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.6 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 8 | 11 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 8 |
| Freigegeben | ||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Compute Cores | 15 | |
| Matrizengröße | 210 mm | |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 4950 million | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Unterstützte Speicherfrequenz | 2933 MHz | 2933 MHz |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR4 | |
Grafik |
||
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 1100 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| iGPU Kernzahl | 8 | 11 |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Radeon Vega 8 Graphics | Radeon Vega 11 Graphics |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
| Configurable TDP | n/a | 46-65 Watt |
| Unterstützte Sockel | AM4 | AM4 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | Not included | Wraith Stealth |
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | |
Peripherien |
||
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 x8 | 3.0 |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| AMD SenseMI | ||
| The "Zen" Core Architecture | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
