Intel Core i3-1005G1 vs Intel Core i3-4150
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Core i3-1005G1 und Intel Core i3-4150 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Grafik-Bildqualität, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i3-1005G1
- Etwa 39% höhere Kerntemperatur: 100 °C vs 72°C
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht einen leistungsfähigeren, aber dennoch kühleren laufenden Prozessor: 10 nm vs 22 nm
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 64 GB vs 32 GB
- 3.6x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 54 Watt
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2171 vs 1930
- Etwa 43% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 4869 vs 3399
- Etwa 31% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1001 vs 767
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2095 vs 1635
- 9.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.334 vs 2.505
- 6.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 291.183 vs 46.419
- 4.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.334 vs 0.304
- 15.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.161 vs 1.213
- 9.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 28.682 vs 2.987
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1666 vs 721
- Etwa 70% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1762 vs 1035
- Etwa 62% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4059 vs 2510
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1666 vs 721
- Etwa 70% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1762 vs 1035
- Etwa 62% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4059 vs 2510
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 100 °C vs 72°C |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 10 nm vs 22 nm |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 64 GB vs 32 GB |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 54 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2171 vs 1930 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 4869 vs 3399 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1001 vs 767 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2095 vs 1635 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.334 vs 2.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 291.183 vs 46.419 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.334 vs 0.304 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.161 vs 1.213 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.682 vs 2.987 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1666 vs 721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1762 vs 1035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4059 vs 2510 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1666 vs 721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1762 vs 1035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4059 vs 2510 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Core i3-1005G1
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-4150
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i3-1005G1 | Intel Core i3-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2171 | 1930 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 4869 | 3399 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1001 | 767 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2095 | 1635 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.334 | 2.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 291.183 | 46.419 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.334 | 0.304 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.161 | 1.213 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.682 | 2.987 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1666 | 721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1762 | 1035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4059 | 2510 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1666 | 721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1762 | 1035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4059 | 2510 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Core i3-1005G1 | Intel Core i3-4150 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Ice Lake | Haswell |
| Family | Core i3 | |
| Startdatum | 1 Aug 2019 | Q2'14 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $281 | |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1143 | 2338 |
| Processor Number | i3-1005G1 | i3-4150 |
| Vertikales Segment | Mobile | Desktop |
| Serie | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i3 Processors | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 1.20 GHz | 3.50 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 4 GT/s | 5 GT/s DMI2 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 10 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 100 °C | 72°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.40 GHz | |
| Anzahl der Adern | 2 | 2 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 4 |
Speicher |
||
| ECC-Speicherunterstützung | ||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 55.63 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733 | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V |
Grafik |
||
| Device ID | 0x8A56 | 0x41E |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 900 MHz | |
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel UHD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 4400 |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.15 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 2 GB | |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | 3 |
| DVI | ||
| VGA | ||
Grafik-Bildqualität |
||
| Unterstützung von 4K-Auflösungen | ||
| Maximale Auflösung über DisplayPort | 5120 x 3200 | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über eDP | 5120 x 3200 | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über HDMI 1.4 | 4096 x 2304 | 4096x2304@24Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | |
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.1/12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 13 Watt | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 900 MHz | |
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FCBGA1526 | FCLGA1150 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 54 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2013C | |
Peripherien |
||
| Anzahl der USB-Ports | 4 | |
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | Up to 3.0 |
| USB-Überarbeitung | 3.2 | |
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 16 | |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Idle States | ||
| Befehlssatzerweiterungen | Intel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2, Intel AVX-512 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® Thermal Velocity Boost | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Core i3-1005G1 mit anderen
IntelCore i3-1005G1 vs
IntelCore i5-4202Y
IntelCore i3-1005G1 vs
IntelCeleron 3867U
IntelCore i3-1005G1 vs
AMDRX-418GD
IntelCore i3-1005G1 vs
IntelCore i5-8257U
IntelCore i3-1005G1 vs
AMDRyzen 5 3500C
IntelCore i3-1005G1 vs
AMDAthlon Gold 7220U
