Intel Core i3-4160 vs Intel Core i5-4570T
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Core i3-4160 und Intel Core i5-4570T Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Grafik-Bildqualität, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i3-4160
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 0 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 9% höhere Kerntemperatur: 72°C vs 66.35°C
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1984 vs 1907
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 3512 vs 3231
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 801 vs 795
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1714 vs 1663
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.495 vs 2.326
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 40.003 vs 39.165
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.319 vs 0.26
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.239 vs 1.035
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.033 vs 2.74
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1758 vs 1564
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2951 vs 2506
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1758 vs 1564
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2951 vs 2506
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | July 2014 vs June 2013 |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 72°C vs 66.35°C |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1984 vs 1907 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3512 vs 3231 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 801 vs 795 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1714 vs 1663 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.495 vs 2.326 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 40.003 vs 39.165 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.319 vs 0.26 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.239 vs 1.035 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.033 vs 2.74 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1758 vs 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2951 vs 2506 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1758 vs 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2951 vs 2506 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i5-4570T
- Etwa {Prozent}% mehr L3 Cache; weitere Daten können im Cache L3 gespeichert werden, um später schnell darauf zugreifen zu können
- Etwa 54% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 35 Watt vs 54 Watt
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 942 vs 809
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 942 vs 809
| Spezifikationen | |
| L3 Cache | 4096 KB (shared) vs 3072 KB (shared) |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 54 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 942 vs 809 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 942 vs 809 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Core i3-4160
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-4570T
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i3-4160 | Intel Core i5-4570T |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1984 | 1907 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3512 | 3231 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 801 | 795 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1714 | 1663 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.495 | 2.326 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 40.003 | 39.165 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.319 | 0.26 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.239 | 1.035 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.033 | 2.74 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 809 | 942 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1758 | 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2951 | 2506 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 809 | 942 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1758 | 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2951 | 2506 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Core i3-4160 | Intel Core i5-4570T | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Haswell | Haswell |
| Startdatum | July 2014 | June 2013 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $133 | $222 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 2130 | 2136 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $139.99 | $148.99 |
| Processor Number | i3-4160 | i5-4570T |
| Serie | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i3 Processors | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 10.64 | 9.54 |
| Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 3.60 GHz | 2.90 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | 5 GT/s DMI2 |
| Matrizengröße | 177 mm | 177 mm |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 3072 KB (shared) | 4096 KB (shared) |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 72 °C | 72 °C |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 72°C | 66.35°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.6 GHz | 3.60 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 2 | 2 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1400 million | 1400 million |
Speicher |
||
| ECC-Speicherunterstützung | ||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V |
Grafik |
||
| Device ID | 0x41E | 0x412 |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.15 GHz | 1.15 GHz |
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 1.15 GHz | 1.15 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel® HD Graphics 4400 | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 |
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | 3 |
| VGA | ||
| Unterstützung für Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Grafik-Bildqualität |
||
| Maximale Auflösung über DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über eDP | 3840x2160@60Hz | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | 4096x2304@24Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | 1920x1200@60Hz |
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 11.1/12 | 11.2/12 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.3 |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FCLGA1150 | FCLGA1150 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 54 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2013C | PCG 2013A |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express Revision | Up to 3.0 | Up to 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
| Anti-Theft Technologie | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Befehlssatzerweiterungen | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Intel® My WiFi Technologie | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Core i3-4160 mit anderen
IntelCore i3-4160 vs
IntelCore i3-2125
IntelCore i3-4160 vs
AMDFX-4320
IntelCore i3-4160 vs
AMDA10-5800B
IntelCore i3-4160 vs
IntelCore i5-4570T
IntelCore i3-4160 vs
AMDA4-4000
IntelCore i3-4160 vs
IntelPentium G3460
