Intel Core i5-4590 vs Intel Core i5-4570
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Core i5-4590 und Intel Core i5-4570 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Grafik-Bildqualität, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i5-4590
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 10 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 3% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.70 GHz vs 3.60 GHz
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2085 vs 2033
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 5365 vs 5220
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 876 vs 861
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2820 vs 2767
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.798 vs 3.626
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 2.137 vs 2.048
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 6.131 vs 5.537
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3383 vs 3326
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3383 vs 3326
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | May 2014 vs June 2013 |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.70 GHz vs 3.60 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2085 vs 2033 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5365 vs 5220 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 876 vs 861 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2820 vs 2767 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.798 vs 3.626 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.137 vs 2.048 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.131 vs 5.537 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3383 vs 3326 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3383 vs 3326 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i5-4570
- Etwa 50% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score: 2833 vs 1893
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 74.525 vs 71.742
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.434 vs 0.404
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1143 vs 1067
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2080 vs 2023
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1143 vs 1067
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2080 vs 2023
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2833 vs 1893 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 74.525 vs 71.742 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.434 vs 0.404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1143 vs 1067 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2080 vs 2023 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1143 vs 1067 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2080 vs 2023 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-4590
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-4570
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i5-4590 | Intel Core i5-4570 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2085 | 2033 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5365 | 5220 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 876 | 861 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2820 | 2767 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 1893 | 2833 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.798 | 3.626 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 71.742 | 74.525 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.404 | 0.434 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.137 | 2.048 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.131 | 5.537 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1067 | 1143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2023 | 2080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3383 | 3326 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1067 | 1143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2023 | 2080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3383 | 3326 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Core i5-4590 | Intel Core i5-4570 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Haswell | Haswell |
| Startdatum | May 2014 | June 2013 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $300 | $221 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1826 | 1805 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $188.99 | $174.99 |
| Processor Number | i5-4590 | i5-4570 |
| Serie | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 11.38 | 11.99 |
| Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 3.30 GHz | 3.20 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | 5 GT/s DMI2 |
| Matrizengröße | 177 mm | 177 mm |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 6144 KB (shared) | 6144 KB (shared) |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 72 °C | 72 °C |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 72.72°C | 72.72°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.70 GHz | 3.60 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1400 million | 1400 million |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V |
Grafik |
||
| Device ID | 0x412 | 0x412 |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.15 GHz | 1.15 GHz |
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 1.15 GHz | 1.15 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | 3 |
| VGA | ||
| Unterstützung für Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Grafik-Bildqualität |
||
| Maximale Auflösung über DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über eDP | 3840x2160@60Hz | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | 4096x2304@24Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | 1920x1200@60Hz |
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 11.2/12 | 11.2/12 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.3 |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FCLGA1150 | FCLGA1150 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 84 Watt | 84 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2013D | PCG 2013D |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express Revision | Up to 3.0 | Up to 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Anti-Theft Technologie | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Befehlssatzerweiterungen | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® My WiFi Technologie | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Core i5-4590 mit anderen
IntelCore i5-4590 vs
AMDAthlon 64 X2 6400+ BE
IntelCore i5-4590 vs
AMDSempron 150
IntelCore i5-4590 vs
IntelCore i7-980
IntelCore i5-4590 vs
IntelCore i3-2102
IntelCore i5-4590 vs
AMDA4 PRO-7350B
IntelCore i5-4590 vs
IntelPentium Silver J5040
