Intel Core i5-5675C vs Intel Core i7-4770S
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Core i5-5675C und Intel Core i7-4770S Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Grafik-Bildqualität, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i5-5675C
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht einen leistungsfähigeren, aber dennoch kühleren laufenden Prozessor: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2234 vs 2123
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 989 vs 875
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 3577 vs 3187
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 6.401 vs 5.8
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3147 vs 1154
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3147 vs 1154
| Spezifikationen | |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2234 vs 2123 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 989 vs 875 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3577 vs 3187 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.401 vs 5.8 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3147 vs 1154 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3147 vs 1154 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i7-4770S
- 4 Mehr Kanäle: 8 vs 4
- Etwa 8% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.90 GHz vs 3.60 GHz
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 6747 vs 5606
- Etwa 45% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.82 vs 3.323
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 80.896 vs 75.856
- Etwa 40% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.606 vs 0.432
- 3.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 2.325 vs 0.601
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4042 vs 3649
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4377 vs 3360
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4042 vs 3649
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4377 vs 3360
| Spezifikationen | |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 8 vs 4 |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.90 GHz vs 3.60 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 6747 vs 5606 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.82 vs 3.323 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 80.896 vs 75.856 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.606 vs 0.432 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.325 vs 0.601 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4042 vs 3649 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4377 vs 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4042 vs 3649 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4377 vs 3360 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-5675C
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-4770S
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i5-5675C | Intel Core i7-4770S |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2234 | 2123 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5606 | 6747 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 989 | 875 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3577 | 3187 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.323 | 4.82 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 75.856 | 80.896 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.432 | 0.606 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.601 | 2.325 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.401 | 5.8 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3147 | 1154 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3649 | 4042 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 4377 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3147 | 1154 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3649 | 4042 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 4377 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 8154 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Core i5-5675C | Intel Core i7-4770S | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Broadwell | Haswell |
| Startdatum | Q2'15 | June 2013 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1272 | 1285 |
| Processor Number | i5-5675C | i7-4770S |
| Serie | 5th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $329 | |
| Jetzt kaufen | $249.99 | |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 11.00 | |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 3.10 GHz | 3.10 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | 5 GT/s DMI2 |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.60 GHz | 3.90 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 8 |
| Matrizengröße | 177 mm | |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | |
| L3 Cache | 8192 KB (shared) | |
| Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 71 °C | |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 71.35°C | |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1400 million | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V |
Grafik |
||
| Device ID | 0x1622 | 0x412 |
| eDRAM | 128 MB | |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.10 GHz | 1.20 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® Clear Video Technologie | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 32 GB | 2 GB |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel® Iris® Pro Graphics 6200 | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 |
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 1.2 GHz | |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | 3 |
| VGA | ||
| Unterstützung für Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Grafik-Bildqualität |
||
| Maximale Auflösung über DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über eDP | 3840x2160@60Hz | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | 4096x2304@24Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | 1920x1200@60Hz |
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 | 11.2/12 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.3 |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 37 W | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 2.10 GHz | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FCLGA1150 | FCLGA1150 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCA 2013D | PCG 2013C |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | Up to 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | 1S Only |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Anti-Theft Technologie | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Befehlssatzerweiterungen | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® My WiFi Technologie | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Core i5-5675C mit anderen
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
IntelCore i7-4770S
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
AMDPRO A6-8550B
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
IntelCore i7-9700KF
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
AMDRyzen 5 3500
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
AMDAthlon 3000G
IntelCore i5-5675C vs
IntelCeleron G4950
