Intel Core i5-7200U vs Intel Core i5-4300M
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Core i5-7200U und Intel Core i5-4300M Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Grafik-Bildqualität, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i5-7200U
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 3 Jahr(e) 2 Monat(e) später
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht einen leistungsfähigeren, aber dennoch kühleren laufenden Prozessor: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- 2.5x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 37 Watt
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 3374 vs 2982
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1529 vs 1476
- Etwa 94% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 38.122 vs 19.695
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.358 vs 0.316
- Etwa 42% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1535 vs 1081
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4797 vs 4709
- Etwa 42% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1535 vs 1081
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4797 vs 4709
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 30 August 2016 vs 4 June 2013 |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 37 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1739 vs 1735 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3374 vs 2982 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1529 vs 1476 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 38.122 vs 19.695 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.358 vs 0.316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1535 vs 1081 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4797 vs 4709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1535 vs 1081 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4797 vs 4709 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i5-4300M
- Etwa 6% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.30 GHz vs 3.10 GHz
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 683 vs 669
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.633 vs 2.285
- Etwa 41% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.529 vs 1.083
- Etwa 98% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 5.234 vs 2.644
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3248 vs 2492
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3248 vs 2492
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.30 GHz vs 3.10 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 683 vs 669 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.633 vs 2.285 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.529 vs 1.083 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.234 vs 2.644 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3248 vs 2492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3248 vs 2492 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-7200U
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-4300M
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i5-7200U | Intel Core i5-4300M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1739 | 1735 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3374 | 2982 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 669 | 683 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1529 | 1476 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 1757 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.285 | 6.633 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 38.122 | 19.695 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.358 | 0.316 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.083 | 1.529 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.644 | 5.234 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1535 | 1081 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2492 | 3248 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4797 | 4709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1535 | 1081 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2492 | 3248 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4797 | 4709 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Core i5-7200U | Intel Core i5-4300M | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Kaby Lake | Haswell |
| Startdatum | 30 August 2016 | 4 June 2013 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $281 | $227 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1710 | 1585 |
| Processor Number | i5-7200U | i5-4300M |
| Serie | 7th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Vertikales Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 2.50 GHz | 2.60 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 4 GT/s OPI | 5 GT/s DMI2 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB | 3072 KB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 100°C | 100°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.10 GHz | 3.30 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 2 | 2 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 4 |
| Matrizengröße | 130 mm | |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 960 Million | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 34.1 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 | DDR3L 1333/1600 |
Grafik |
||
| Device ID | 0x5916 | 0x416 |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.00 GHz | 1.25 GHz |
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 1 GHz | 1.25 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® Clear Video Technologie | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 32 GB | 2 GB |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel® HD Graphics 620 | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | 3 |
| Unterstützung für Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Grafik-Bildqualität |
||
| Unterstützung von 4K-Auflösungen | ||
| Maximale Auflösung über DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Maximale Auflösung über HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über VGA | N / A | 2880x1800@60Hz |
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2/12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 7.5 W | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 800 MHz | |
| Configurable TDP-up | 25 W | |
| Configurable TDP-up Frequency | 2.70 GHz | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 42mm X 24mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm x 4.7mm |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FCBGA1356 | FCPGA946 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 37 Watt |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 12 | 16 |
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 3 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1 | 1x16 or 2x8 or 1x8 2x4 |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
| Anti-Theft Technologie | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Befehlssatzerweiterungen | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® My WiFi Technologie | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Smart Response Technologie | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Core i5-7200U mit anderen
IntelCore i5-7200U vs
IntelXeon E5-4648 v3
IntelCore i5-7200U vs
IntelXeon E5-4628L v4
IntelCore i5-7200U vs
IntelCeleron G3900E
IntelCore i5-7200U vs
AMDRX-425BB
IntelCore i5-7200U vs
AMDRX-421BD
IntelCore i5-7200U vs
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 3500U
