Intel Core i5-8250U vs Intel Core i5-3470
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Core i5-8250U und Intel Core i5-3470 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Grafik-Bildqualität, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i5-8250U
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 5 Jahr(e) 4 Monat(e) später
- 4 Mehr Kanäle: 8 vs 4
- Etwa 48% höhere Kerntemperatur: 100°C vs 67.4°C
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht einen leistungsfähigeren, aber dennoch kühleren laufenden Prozessor: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- 5.1x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 77 Watt
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 5826 vs 4671
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 770 vs 734
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2911 vs 2396
- 8.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.131 vs 3.217
- 29.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 280.161 vs 9.637
- 4.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.755 vs 0.393
- 11x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.947 vs 1.821
- 5.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 30.385 vs 5.424
- 3.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5401 vs 1515
- 3.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5401 vs 1515
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 21 August 2017 vs 8 April 2012 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 8 vs 4 |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 100°C vs 67.4°C |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 77 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5826 vs 4671 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 770 vs 734 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2911 vs 2396 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.131 vs 3.217 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 280.161 vs 9.637 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.755 vs 0.393 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.947 vs 1.821 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.385 vs 5.424 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5401 vs 1515 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5401 vs 1515 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i5-3470
- Etwa 6% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.60 GHz vs 3.40 GHz
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1937 vs 1889
- Etwa 59% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score: 2696 vs 1696
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.60 GHz vs 3.40 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1937 vs 1889 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2696 vs 1696 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-8250U
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-3470
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i5-8250U | Intel Core i5-3470 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1889 | 1937 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 5826 | 4671 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 770 | 734 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2911 | 2396 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 1696 | 2696 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.131 | 3.217 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 280.161 | 9.637 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.755 | 0.393 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.947 | 1.821 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.385 | 5.424 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1688 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3199 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5401 | 1515 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1688 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3199 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5401 | 1515 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Core i5-8250U | Intel Core i5-3470 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Kaby Lake R | Ivy Bridge |
| Startdatum | 21 August 2017 | 8 April 2012 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $297 | $184 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 986 | 2409 |
| Processor Number | i5-8250U | i5-3470 |
| Serie | 8th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Vertikales Segment | Mobile | Desktop |
| Jetzt kaufen | $112.06 | |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 17.60 | |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 1.60 GHz | 3.20 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 4 GT/s OPI | 5 GT/s DMI |
| Matrizengröße | 123 mm | 132.8 mm |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1024 KB |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB | 6144 KB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 72 °C | 67 °C |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 100°C | 67.4°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.40 GHz | 3.60 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 8 | 4 |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 34.1 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR3 1333/1600 |
Grafik |
||
| Device ID | 0x5917 | 0x152 |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.10 GHz | 1.10 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® Clear Video Technologie | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 32 GB | |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel® UHD Graphics 620 | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 |
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 1.1 GHz | |
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | 3 |
| Unterstützung für Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Grafik-Bildqualität |
||
| Unterstützung von 4K-Auflösungen | ||
| Maximale Auflösung über DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Maximale Auflösung über eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Maximale Auflösung über HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 10 W | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 800 MHz | |
| Configurable TDP-up | 25 W | |
| Configurable TDP-up Frequency | 1.80 GHz | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 42mm X 24mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FC-BGA1356 | FCLGA1155 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 77 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | 2011D | |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 12 | |
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1 | up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 & 2x4 |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
| Anti-Theft Technologie | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Befehlssatzerweiterungen | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® My WiFi Technologie | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Smart Response Technologie | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Core i5-8250U mit anderen
IntelCore i5-8250U vs
IntelCore i7-6650U
IntelCore i5-8250U vs
IntelCore i7-7820HQ
IntelCore i5-8250U vs
AMDRX-418GD
IntelCore i5-8250U vs
IntelCore i3-1115G4E
IntelCore i5-8250U vs
AMDRyzen 3 7320U
IntelCore i5-8250U vs
AMDAthlon Gold 7220U
